메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
서연희 (전북대학교) 전혜령 (한국체육대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제22권 제5호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2013.10
수록면
1,529 - 1,540 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Balance beam according to the configuration rules amended before 2009 and revised in 2013 comparative analysis routines, detailed strategies are as follows: Difficulty analyzing information before acting revision after revision of the rules applied to the evaluation of each difficulty level through the comparative analysis Difficulty Changes JW, GC, DL players were all the same. Values that connect the JW player +0.60 points before the revision of the contents was evaluated in the same acting in accordance with the rules and values that the revision of the 0.10 point difference was 0.50 points. The G. L player +0.40 points before revision after revision value from 0.30 to 0.10 points points points showed differences, D. L in that player before revision after revision 0.30 +0.50 points difference was 0.20 points. General Gam Gam Company and certain additional items, including the JW player was evaluated before revision after revision from 1.10 points to 1.70 and 0.60 point deduction this up, GC player before revision after revision 2.40 points from 1.90 points get deducted for deduction of 0.30 was added. DL players before revision after revision 2.60 points from 2.20 points to 0.40 points of difference was deducted. Balance beam configuration and the results of a comparative analysis artistry deduction JW player configuration and artistry deducted before revision, in the absence of additional items, including penalties received deduction of 0.30 points, GC player before revision after revision 0.30 points from 0.10 points received deduction for the difference was 0.20 points. DC players before revision after revision 0.30 points from 0.10 points get deducted for the difference was 0.20 points.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 논의
Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-690-002647282