메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김외현 (영남대학교)
저널정보
신영어영문학회 신영어영문학 신영어영문학 제56집
발행연도
2013.11
수록면
47 - 76 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Dickens conceived the main idea of A Tale of Two Cities from Wilkie Collins’s drama of The Frozen Deep and embodied it in the form of historical novel on the basis of Thomas Carlyle’s The French Revolution. But A Tale of Two Cities has been regarded by some critics as lacking the social vision and criticism common to the other later novels. The critics have judged it a failure as a historical novel and dismissed it as intellectually superficial. They have argued that Dickens recognized the end of the old system but could not embody a new in his novel. But Dickens shows clearly enough that the French Revolution was bound to happen because of the oppression and exploitation of the French aristocracy and repeats this over and over again throughout the novel. One of the deepest impressions we get in this novel is the abhorrence on oppression. In spite of the obvious hatred for the mad and uncontrollable fury of the crowd, Dickens attributes all kinds of social evil to its leaders. He acknowledges the justification of the repressed people’s fury and resistance, and it is a strong evidence of his recognition of the inevitability of the revolution. Dickens’s later novels reveal subversive instinct, and this instinct is clearly at work in A Tale of Two Cities.

목차

인용문헌

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-003520746