지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Pushkin’s drama Boris Godunov and Oh Taesok’s drama “Tae” dealt with similar tragic incidents of history, ‘the murder of heir to the throne and usurpation of the throne’. They broke away from teleological description method with the dominant view and interpretation about the past and tried to reveal the truth of history through multifaceted perspective and many different voices.
The drama Boris Godunov described the process, that Godunov, who assassinated the crown prince and ascended the throne, suffered from compunction and went to ruin by popular uprising, in 23 scenes. Oh Taesok’s drama “Tae” have two main stories of King Sejo’s distress from of the murder of Danjong and ‘blood lines’ of Park Paengnyeon’s family. The history, Pushkin and Oh Taesok understood, is irrational world, that shows estrangement between reality and appearance. And this absurdity was repeated in history. Their dramas show the age?spatial difference, but the historical consciousness of two writers, who recognize the power problem of usurpation of the throne and historic events, are based on historical view of vicious circle with nihilism. But Pushkin’s historical consciousness have aspect of passive nihilism with no way out, but Oh Taeseok’s historical view shows aspect of active nihilism to overcome nihilism. And Oh Taeseok seeks for meaning and value of life and history in the ‘blood lines’ to overcome unreasonable historical situation.
Pushkin and Oh Taeseok regarded the history as absurd comedy. Pushkin showed avowedly the fact, the history is only a drama text as fiction. Oh Taeseok made historic events and facts into children’s play and sublimated nihilism of history to Dionysus’s play. Especially, they tried to newly interpret the fiction of history through the description method of crash montage.
Above all, their writing of history is for ethnicity understanding of their own country. Pushkin and Oh Taeseok emphasized, the power of will to lead the history is a ‘the public’ and ‘blood lines’. Nonetheless, Pushkin pessimistically predicted the future of russian public as like the crying baby, who was thrown on the ground in drama Boris Godunov. But Oh Taeseok insisted, the blood lines have positive meaning and value of life through the son’s life force of Park Paengnyeon’s family.
The drama Boris Godunov described the process, that Godunov, who assassinated the crown prince and ascended the throne, suffered from compunction and went to ruin by popular uprising, in 23 scenes. Oh Taesok’s drama “Tae” have two main stories of King Sejo’s distress from of the murder of Danjong and ‘blood lines’ of Park Paengnyeon’s family. The history, Pushkin and Oh Taesok understood, is irrational world, that shows estrangement between reality and appearance. And this absurdity was repeated in history. Their dramas show the age?spatial difference, but the historical consciousness of two writers, who recognize the power problem of usurpation of the throne and historic events, are based on historical view of vicious circle with nihilism. But Pushkin’s historical consciousness have aspect of passive nihilism with no way out, but Oh Taeseok’s historical view shows aspect of active nihilism to overcome nihilism. And Oh Taeseok seeks for meaning and value of life and history in the ‘blood lines’ to overcome unreasonable historical situation.
Pushkin and Oh Taeseok regarded the history as absurd comedy. Pushkin showed avowedly the fact, the history is only a drama text as fiction. Oh Taeseok made historic events and facts into children’s play and sublimated nihilism of history to Dionysus’s play. Especially, they tried to newly interpret the fiction of history through the description method of crash montage.
Above all, their writing of history is for ethnicity understanding of their own country. Pushkin and Oh Taeseok emphasized, the power of will to lead the history is a ‘the public’ and ‘blood lines’. Nonetheless, Pushkin pessimistically predicted the future of russian public as like the crying baby, who was thrown on the ground in drama Boris Godunov. But Oh Taeseok insisted, the blood lines have positive meaning and value of life through the son’s life force of Park Paengnyeon’s family.
목차
I. 서론
II. 오태석의 희곡 「태」와 뿌쉬낀의 희곡 『보리스 고두노프』비교 분석
III. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『쿌올루』와 『홍길동전』의 비교문학적 고찰 : 의적형 민중의 영웅 관점을 중심으로
이난아
국제언어문학
2014
.10
뿌쉬낀의 희곡 〈보리스 고두노프〉의 ‘놀이성’ 연구
안숙현
슬라브학보
2013
.12
귀스타브 플로베르의『마담 보바리』 와 정비석의 『자유부인』비교 : 주인공의 자아의식과 그에 따른 행동방식 차이 분석을 중심으로
권보택
동서비교문학저널
2013
.06
『보리스 고두노프』에 나타나는 기적에 대한 민중의 믿음
정지윤
노어노문학
2007
.04
러시아어 ‘별칭 지명’ 을 통해서 본 국가 이미지 연구 : 유라시아 지역을 중심으로
손현익
한국노어노문학회 학술대회 발표집
2014
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-001062930