지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Arctic has long possessed an irreducible significance in military-strategic terms. The Global Warming resulted in Arctic ice melting, and competition among the Arctic states such as, United States, Canada, Russia, Norway, Denmark, for the resources accelerated. It is a natural consequences of geopolitics. A series of developments in military technology dramatically increased the role of the Arctic as a theater for the operations of strategic weapons systems, transforming the region into an area of intense interest to those countries concerned with the global strategic balance.
Recent attention on the Arctic, however, has typically covered climatic changes, natural resources, sovereignty claims, and new shipping lanes. Thereafter, little discussed are Arctic security challenges and regional military posture shifts. The larger Arctic states such as United States, Canada, and Russia are clarifying national interests, increasing A rctic operations, and trumpeting plans to expand military (largely maritime) capacity.
Yet employing forces in the Arctic is far easier said than done, because the harsh environment makes military operations expensive and dangerous. Therefore climatic changes, natural resources, sovereignty claims, new sea lanes as well as military balance of power will be the central issues of the Arctic. For now, Arctic capabilities of northern nations do not match the strength of their ambitions. Nevertheless, the high stakes suggest this could soon change.
Recent attention on the Arctic, however, has typically covered climatic changes, natural resources, sovereignty claims, and new shipping lanes. Thereafter, little discussed are Arctic security challenges and regional military posture shifts. The larger Arctic states such as United States, Canada, and Russia are clarifying national interests, increasing A rctic operations, and trumpeting plans to expand military (largely maritime) capacity.
Yet employing forces in the Arctic is far easier said than done, because the harsh environment makes military operations expensive and dangerous. Therefore climatic changes, natural resources, sovereignty claims, new sea lanes as well as military balance of power will be the central issues of the Arctic. For now, Arctic capabilities of northern nations do not match the strength of their ambitions. Nevertheless, the high stakes suggest this could soon change.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 북극을 둘러 싼 군비경쟁
Ⅲ. 북극 군사화의 정치적 함의
Ⅳ. 안보적 도전들
Ⅴ. 결론 - 자원 경쟁과 갈등의 미래
참고문헌
참고문헌 (58)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 국방부 / 2008 / 국방백서
2. [단행본] - 박미화 / 2010 / 북극해 쟁탈전 / 더숲출판
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 배규성 / 2010 / 북극권 쟁점과 북극해 거버넌스 / 21세기정치학회보 20 (3) : 457 ~ 478
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 윤영미 / 2009 / 러시아의 북국지역에 대한 해양안보 전략: 북극해 개발과 한-러 해양협력을 중심으로 / 동서연구 21 (2) : 45 ~ 80
5. [보고서] - 서동주 / 2009 / 러시아 국가안보전략 2020의 정책적 함의와 파급영향
2. [단행본] - 박미화 / 2010 / 북극해 쟁탈전 / 더숲출판
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 배규성 / 2010 / 북극권 쟁점과 북극해 거버넌스 / 21세기정치학회보 20 (3) : 457 ~ 478
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 윤영미 / 2009 / 러시아의 북국지역에 대한 해양안보 전략: 북극해 개발과 한-러 해양협력을 중심으로 / 동서연구 21 (2) : 45 ~ 80
5. [보고서] - 서동주 / 2009 / 러시아 국가안보전략 2020의 정책적 함의와 파급영향
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-340-001258579