지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.2
- 수록면
- 59 - 66 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
G-SEED aims for establishing green environmental building with energy saving and has started for evaluating with multi-residential complex in 2002 by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure & Transport (MOLIT) and the Ministry of Environment to develop the current 10 building types and new & existing building types to be applied. Since G-SEED has been developed for more than 10 years, the strategy of globalization is needed with constant review itself and comparison between other assessments to understand current situation from the global perspectives.
This study draws similarities and differences of G-SEED and LEED criteria by the comparison from re-constructed LEED criteria based on G-SEED. "Energy & Pollution" is the most concerned category in both assessments as the result of analysis on category rates. Next concerns are "Material & Resources", "Indoor Environment" and "Water Management". The unique categories in both criteria are "Ecological Environment" in G-SEED and "Innovation & Design Process" in LEED. The conclusion of this research is that two assessments are organized at different locations and with different strategies for developing green building but there are common concerns such as energy saving, material use, indoor environment. As a result, it is expected to use fundamental data for developing G-SEED for global standard.
This study draws similarities and differences of G-SEED and LEED criteria by the comparison from re-constructed LEED criteria based on G-SEED. "Energy & Pollution" is the most concerned category in both assessments as the result of analysis on category rates. Next concerns are "Material & Resources", "Indoor Environment" and "Water Management". The unique categories in both criteria are "Ecological Environment" in G-SEED and "Innovation & Design Process" in LEED. The conclusion of this research is that two assessments are organized at different locations and with different strategies for developing green building but there are common concerns such as energy saving, material use, indoor environment. As a result, it is expected to use fundamental data for developing G-SEED for global standard.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Review
3. Comparison of Certification Criteria between G-SEED and LEED
4. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (5)
참고문헌 신청
1. [기타자료] - / 2010 / G-SEED Certification Criteria / MOLIT Notification No.2010-301
2. [인터넷자원] - / / G-SEED Certification Data
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이현우 / 2011 / 국내 친환경건축물 인증제도와 LEED의 평가항목 비교 연구-업무시설을 중심으로 / 한국태양에너지학회 논문집 31 (1) : 78 ~ 86
4. [학술대회논문] - Park, Cheol-Yong / 2010 / A study on Correlation between KGBC and LEED by examining the certification cases / A Paper Collection for Academic Symposium of AIK 30 (1)
5. [인터넷자원] - / / LEED V2.2
2. [인터넷자원] - / / G-SEED Certification Data
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이현우 / 2011 / 국내 친환경건축물 인증제도와 LEED의 평가항목 비교 연구-업무시설을 중심으로 / 한국태양에너지학회 논문집 31 (1) : 78 ~ 86
4. [학술대회논문] - Park, Cheol-Yong / 2010 / A study on Correlation between KGBC and LEED by examining the certification cases / A Paper Collection for Academic Symposium of AIK 30 (1)
5. [인터넷자원] - / / LEED V2.2
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
녹색건축 인증제도의 일반건축물 인증항목 특성 분석
윤요선
,
조동우
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2017
.10
국내 녹색건축 인증제 (G-SEED) 평가를 위한 BIM 시스템 적용방안에 관한 연구
이용주
,
김미경
,
전한종
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2016
.12
BREEAM의 구성체계와 의료시설을 위한 세부항목 분석
임영환
,
윤은지
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2015
.12
녹색건축 업무용건축물의 사후평가 분석
이성옥
,
조동우
,
박철용
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015
.10
국내 건축물 인증제도에 대한 비교분석
정찬연
,
홍용석
,
김경호
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2015
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-600-001250127