지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The present paper aims to examine the commonalities shown in the development of the laity-centric societies, Hyang-do of Korea and Yi-she of China, and to explore the causes of the phenomena.
Hyang-do, a Buddhist worshipping institution, originated from Three Kingdom Period in Korea, and supported Buddhist offering rituals as well as other faith-embedded activities in the coalition of monks and laity. However, it went through a different phase as it suffered a lack of leadership from the monks since the Chosun Dynasty.
Yi-she, a Chinese laity-centric society of Buddhism, stepped a similar developmental route. Generally, the monks and Geo-sa took the initiatives in the faith society in Chinese buddhism, however, it differentiated to a Yi-she, laity-centric society where lay people played major roles in their practice and activities. In the beginning, the laity-centric society emphasized practicing merit faith by offering Buddhist rituals, but it showed a strong feature of networking in the folks that aimed cooperation and coalition in the life rituals such as funerals in the later period.
The two laity-centric societies showed several differences such as the external forces` involvement to the societies, and their primary practice and activity-network. In the mean time, they shared a commonality in their developmental changes. Both experienced the growth of socieities initially under the leadership of monks by merit faith, however, the coalition between the monks and the laity weakened due to internal and external reasons. Eventually, the phenomenon facilitated the laity to have a cooperative coalition among themselves.
The commonalities between the two buddhist laity-centric societies that equally valued both faith and coalition showed the following phenomenon; a weakened faith resulted a strengthened networking in laity. As a result, the funeral rite, which required the most urgent cooperative coalition among the members of the society, seemed to be able to actively sustain until the end of its society.
Hyang-do, a Buddhist worshipping institution, originated from Three Kingdom Period in Korea, and supported Buddhist offering rituals as well as other faith-embedded activities in the coalition of monks and laity. However, it went through a different phase as it suffered a lack of leadership from the monks since the Chosun Dynasty.
Yi-she, a Chinese laity-centric society of Buddhism, stepped a similar developmental route. Generally, the monks and Geo-sa took the initiatives in the faith society in Chinese buddhism, however, it differentiated to a Yi-she, laity-centric society where lay people played major roles in their practice and activities. In the beginning, the laity-centric society emphasized practicing merit faith by offering Buddhist rituals, but it showed a strong feature of networking in the folks that aimed cooperation and coalition in the life rituals such as funerals in the later period.
The two laity-centric societies showed several differences such as the external forces` involvement to the societies, and their primary practice and activity-network. In the mean time, they shared a commonality in their developmental changes. Both experienced the growth of socieities initially under the leadership of monks by merit faith, however, the coalition between the monks and the laity weakened due to internal and external reasons. Eventually, the phenomenon facilitated the laity to have a cooperative coalition among themselves.
The commonalities between the two buddhist laity-centric societies that equally valued both faith and coalition showed the following phenomenon; a weakened faith resulted a strengthened networking in laity. As a result, the funeral rite, which required the most urgent cooperative coalition among the members of the society, seemed to be able to actively sustain until the end of its society.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 향도(香徒)와 읍사(邑社), 그 배경과 역사
Ⅲ. 매향(埋香)과 속강 : 승(僧)과 속이 함께 했던 결사의 실천
Ⅳ. 신앙결사에서 상호부조 조직으로 : 지도자 승려의 부재
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-001211928