지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第221輯
- 발행연도
- 2014.3
- 수록면
- 117 - 152 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.16912/khr.2014.03.221.117
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Employing a regional perspective that underlines the interactions of radicals and a new regional term, Eastern Asia, in place of East Asia, this paper suggests that Yan’an be understood as a node of the transnational radical networks that existed in twentieth century Eastern Asia. In Yan’an radicals from Asia and the world were concentrated not only to support China’s anti-Japanese war and/or the Chines Revolution but to get united for the goal of liberating all colonies and oppressed peoples. The history of Yan’an has long been understood and constructed within the context and framework of the Chines Revolution led by the CCP. However, this paper suggests that the history of Yan’an between 1937 and 1945 needs to be understood and constructed also as part of the history of regional radical movements and networks. The radicals and revolutionaries supported not only the Chinese anti-Japanese War efforts but a much broader movement for national liberation, independence, anti-fascism, anti-imperialism, and even the construction of a new Asia under a new social and political order.
What this paper suggests is to move away from the nationalist historiography that excludes transnational actors and their roles in national history. The history of Yan’an belongs to a broader regional history of radicalism as well. The paper thus concludes that the construction of “transnational national history” is much needed, a history that embraces and underlines the roles and presence of the transnational elements in national history.
What this paper suggests is to move away from the nationalist historiography that excludes transnational actors and their roles in national history. The history of Yan’an belongs to a broader regional history of radicalism as well. The paper thus concludes that the construction of “transnational national history” is much needed, a history that embraces and underlines the roles and presence of the transnational elements in national history.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기 : 延安과 동부아시아 급진주의
Ⅱ. 권역시각
Ⅲ. 권역시각에서 본 延安 : 동부아시아 초국가적 급진주의 네트워크의 교점(node)
Ⅳ. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001325428