지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
For the last century, a number of wetlands had already been lost or reclaimed due to the land development for agriculture, industry and watershed management in Korea. But even in these days, wetlands have been under or exposed to considerable developmental pressure even though there has been a Wetlands Conservation Act in effect.
In contrast, “No Net Loss of Wetlands Policy”, a key legislation for wetland conservation in the U.S., has been successful in preventing and/or reducing wetland loss over the last three decades. The policy basically enforces a developer to execute sequential mitigation measures against wetland loss from its land development. When wetland loss is inevitable, the policy requires the developer to carry out a compensatory mitigation as a final measure. In this case, mitigation banks is a major tool to compensate mitigation.
A mitigation bank has a number of advantages in compensatory mitigation. It is cost-beneficial because a large scale wetland can be restored or newly created by the bank"s experts, which significantly reduces uncertainty over success of the mitigation. However, it has also been criticised by the fact that it is almost impossible to replace the original functions and values of a natural wetland to those of a man-made wetland.
In this study, we analyzed mitigation banking system in U.S. in order to consider it as a potential regulatory tool for wetland conservation in Korea. And we also suggested improvement directions of existing Korean legislations and policies in related with mitigation banking system.
In contrast, “No Net Loss of Wetlands Policy”, a key legislation for wetland conservation in the U.S., has been successful in preventing and/or reducing wetland loss over the last three decades. The policy basically enforces a developer to execute sequential mitigation measures against wetland loss from its land development. When wetland loss is inevitable, the policy requires the developer to carry out a compensatory mitigation as a final measure. In this case, mitigation banks is a major tool to compensate mitigation.
A mitigation bank has a number of advantages in compensatory mitigation. It is cost-beneficial because a large scale wetland can be restored or newly created by the bank"s experts, which significantly reduces uncertainty over success of the mitigation. However, it has also been criticised by the fact that it is almost impossible to replace the original functions and values of a natural wetland to those of a man-made wetland.
In this study, we analyzed mitigation banking system in U.S. in order to consider it as a potential regulatory tool for wetland conservation in Korea. And we also suggested improvement directions of existing Korean legislations and policies in related with mitigation banking system.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 습지은행제도의 개념
Ⅲ. 습지은행제도의 운용현황 및 평가
Ⅳ. 습지은행제도의 도입방안
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박성욱 / 2003 / 연안습지의 효율적 관리를 위한 Mitigation 개념의 한국적 적용방안에 관한 연구 - 법제도 개선방안을 중심으로 / Ocean and Polar Research 25 (3s) : 545 ~ 555
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 신승식 / 2000 / 환경보존정책으로서 습지완화은행제도의 개념 및 현황 / 월간 해양수산 : 51 ~ 61
4. [보고서] - 방상원 / 2007 / 습지총량제 도입 방안 구축사업
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Andrea B. Smoktonowicz / 2005 / Federal Conservation of Wetlands runs Amuck with Wetland Mitigation Banking / Ohio Northern University Law Review 31 : 149 ~ 176
6. [단행본] - Environmental Law Institute / 1993 / Wetland Mitigation Banking / Environmental Law Institute
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 신승식 / 2000 / 환경보존정책으로서 습지완화은행제도의 개념 및 현황 / 월간 해양수산 : 51 ~ 61
4. [보고서] - 방상원 / 2007 / 습지총량제 도입 방안 구축사업
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Andrea B. Smoktonowicz / 2005 / Federal Conservation of Wetlands runs Amuck with Wetland Mitigation Banking / Ohio Northern University Law Review 31 : 149 ~ 176
6. [단행본] - Environmental Law Institute / 1993 / Wetland Mitigation Banking / Environmental Law Institute
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
습지총량제의 제도적 고찰
김윤정
,
이상돈
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2008
.02
지속가능한 생태관광을 위한 평가지표 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구
이재혁
,
이희연
대한지리학회지
2012
.12
국내 습지보전을 위한 미국 습지은행제도의 분석 및 고찰
방상원
,
윤익준
한국환경정책학회 학술대회논문집
2010
.10
우리나라 보호지역 관리효과성 평가 고찰 : 적용현황 및 평가결과를 중심으로
허학영
,
권헌교
한국산림휴양학회지
2012
.12
경남 창녕군 우포늪이 가지는 지질명소로서의 지질유산적 가치
김대우
,
정대교
대한지질학회 학술대회
2018
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0