지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Du Yu(222-284) was involved in the argument about the memorial service for parents in 274. At issue was the matter when emperor and prince should remove of mourning clothes and what to do after removal. At that times the royal family followed the existing system ‘the removal of mourning for official affairs just after burial’(旣葬公除). Only Wu-di (武帝) practiced the ‘in-mind mourning(心喪)’ for remaining of three years mourning after removal.
Du Yu advocated in that argument two points. First, the mourning system of ‘removal of mourning for official affairs just after burial’ had been an old institution from the Shang(商) peeriod. Second, Gojong(高宗) of Shang had practiced mourning in silence for remaining of three years after removal, and entrusted prime minister with pull power of administration of the state, referred to as ‘liangan(諒闇)’. But some inconsistency were found in historical materials on Du Yu‘s argument and his points of view. Even in one material the content was contradictory to each other. This research is initiated to explain the matter of inconsistency.
The best material to indicate clearly Du Yu‘s points of view is the Lizhi (禮志) in Chinese Official Historiography Jinshu (晉書), witch
contained Du Yu’s argument in 274. On the basis of the Lizhi I try a new interpretation of related sentences in Du Yu’s Annotation on Spring and Autumn Annals (春秋左傳) and to solve the matter of contradiction. This reserch is carried out as a part of the study on Du Yu’s argument of liangan(諒闇).
Du Yu advocated in that argument two points. First, the mourning system of ‘removal of mourning for official affairs just after burial’ had been an old institution from the Shang(商) peeriod. Second, Gojong(高宗) of Shang had practiced mourning in silence for remaining of three years after removal, and entrusted prime minister with pull power of administration of the state, referred to as ‘liangan(諒闇)’. But some inconsistency were found in historical materials on Du Yu‘s argument and his points of view. Even in one material the content was contradictory to each other. This research is initiated to explain the matter of inconsistency.
The best material to indicate clearly Du Yu‘s points of view is the Lizhi (禮志) in Chinese Official Historiography Jinshu (晉書), witch
contained Du Yu’s argument in 274. On the basis of the Lizhi I try a new interpretation of related sentences in Du Yu’s Annotation on Spring and Autumn Annals (春秋左傳) and to solve the matter of contradiction. This reserch is carried out as a part of the study on Du Yu’s argument of liangan(諒闇).
목차
1. 머리말
2. 西晉시기 ‘旣葬除服’의 개념과 『左傳注』의 의문점
3.『晉書』『禮志』의견서와『左傳注』의 비교
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
中國古中世史學會 會則 외
편집부
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
榮新江, 『中古中國與粟特文明』 : 北京: 生活ㆍ讀書ㆍ新知三聯書店, 2014.8 7 p. (目次) + 3 p. (序) + 10 p. (代前言) + 445 p. (本文ㆍ索引).
李基天
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
唐ㆍ五代 法典 編纂 形式의 변화와 그 성격 : 『唐會要』ㆍ『五代會要』 ‘定格令’ 譯註
鄭炳俊
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
唐 文宗 시기 甘露之變에 대한 재고찰 : 宦官 仇士良 세력의 역할을 중심으로
柳浚炯
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
『梁書ㆍ蕭琛傳』 所見齊、梁間的南北互動
李廣健
중국고중세사연구
2015
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001516561