메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jin Soo Kim Ji Yeon Kim (Chungnam National University School of Medicine) Sang-Jeon Lee (Chungbuk National University School of Medicine) Dong Kook Park (Dankook University College of Medicine) Hwan Namgung (Dankook University College of Medicine) Chang Nam Kim (Eulji University School of Medicine) Won Jun Choi (Konyang University College of Medicine) Moo Jun Baek (Sooncheonhyang University College of Medicine)
저널정보
대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.87 No.1
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
9 - 13 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) have a negative impact on patients’ quality of life and frequently pointed to as a major factor for treatment abandonment. Serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonist is considered as key treatment for CINV. Ramosetron and palonosetron are recently developed 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and known as more superior than other first-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of ramosetron and palonosetron and determine which drug is more effective for prevention of CINV.
Methods: Colorectal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy were enrolled consecutively. Patients were assigned to receive intravenous injection of ramosetron 0.3 mg or palonosetron 0.25 mg at 30 minutes before initiation of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Ramosetron group added oral administration of 0.1 mg ramosetron on the second and third days of chemotherapy. Efficacy parameter consisted of nausea and vomiting.
Results: Ninety-one patients received ramosetron and 89 patients received palonosetron. Presentation of vomiting and nausea symptoms was not significantly different between the two groups during acute (0?24 hours) and delayed period (after 24 hours).
Conclusion: The incidence of CINV between the ramosetron and the palonosetron group has not shown any difference during acute, delayed, and overall period.

목차

INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-510-001669938