지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
These different versions of Holy Mary emerged in the late 20th century can be categorized in many ways. One version is a theoretical reinterpretation of topics such as life and death, social relationship and communications, spiritual healing which are somewhat distant from teachings of Catholic Church. Another Mary shows hyperfemininity symbolizing the physical and social reality of women around the world while other Mary shows an interpretation of mother-nature as a perpetrator of subordination. Therefore, we can see that Mary has become more complex and unfamiliar in a post modern society which can be summed up as diversity and uncertainty.
This is a result of some feminists and artists who saw Mary as perpetrator of dual imprisonment. They used her to sever from the era in which women were forced into physical and psychological sacrifice. The Virgin Mary was also used as a whistle-blower that brought attention to the harsh and uncertain reality as well as a caretaker for the marginalized. There is another concern - that the borrowing and reinterpretation of the Virgin Mary were inevitably accompanied by the damaging and changing of her image and ultimately, the danger of committing sacrilege. Underneath the depiction of the Virgin Mary as aggressive and provocative lied negative perspective that non-believers of Catholicism had on the excessive reverence of the Virgin Mary and Mariology as well as their intention to attack the corruption and prejudice of the Catholic Church.
Many of artists who reinterpreted the Virgin Mary were known as catholic or received catholic education, and they used it as a means of communication which could reveal the desired content and religious or social criticism to the public. The Virgin Mary was treated by many artists not only as a direct target for the criticism and doubts on Catholic church and its doctrine but also as a complex and polysemous expression of representing insecure political, economic, and cultural realities of individuals and modern society or disposing a tragic status of female, homosexuals, and minorities.
This is a result of some feminists and artists who saw Mary as perpetrator of dual imprisonment. They used her to sever from the era in which women were forced into physical and psychological sacrifice. The Virgin Mary was also used as a whistle-blower that brought attention to the harsh and uncertain reality as well as a caretaker for the marginalized. There is another concern - that the borrowing and reinterpretation of the Virgin Mary were inevitably accompanied by the damaging and changing of her image and ultimately, the danger of committing sacrilege. Underneath the depiction of the Virgin Mary as aggressive and provocative lied negative perspective that non-believers of Catholicism had on the excessive reverence of the Virgin Mary and Mariology as well as their intention to attack the corruption and prejudice of the Catholic Church.
Many of artists who reinterpreted the Virgin Mary were known as catholic or received catholic education, and they used it as a means of communication which could reveal the desired content and religious or social criticism to the public. The Virgin Mary was treated by many artists not only as a direct target for the criticism and doubts on Catholic church and its doctrine but also as a complex and polysemous expression of representing insecure political, economic, and cultural realities of individuals and modern society or disposing a tragic status of female, homosexuals, and minorities.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
Ⅱ. 그리스도교의 성모마리아
Ⅲ. 20세기 후반 현대미술에 나타난 성모마리아
Ⅳ. 맺는 글
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-600-001659833