지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 건국대학교 인문학연구원 통일인문학 통일인문학 제57집
- 발행연도
- 2014.3
- 수록면
- 63 - 89 (27page)
- DOI
- 10.21185/jhu.2014.03.57.63
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
War change most of human beings, destroying existence of human beings, devastating dignity of human beings. Ironically, war is the result of the conflict among political ideologies that these sets of things lead human beings to the better world. Considering that war is politics which lasts by other means, The Korean War represents Cold War, and people in south and north korea experienced the most extreme and violent scene.
While “memory of war” only belongs to the people who experienced war, “war of memory” can be shared by the generations who had not experienced war. “War of memory” is a structured discourse which descended or related to war. Both “memory of war” and “war of memory” affect each other, forming a set of discourse.
While “memory of war” is based on the storytelling of war veterans, the storytelling forms “war of memory”, which, as time goes by, makes itself more ardent war discourse than “memory of war”. Furthermore, even people who experienced war seems to structurize his experience as “War of memory” in his brain. In other words, his experience of war slides into the common discourse, “War of memory”. Because memory is not an identification device, which, regardless of social context, interprets or cognizes facts of the past by itself.
It is always problematic that how positive and reasonable this common ownership of war is. Thereby problem is that “War of memory” is a consensus decision ; common memory which are socially stalled memory. So experience of an individual is memorized not by himself but by the tendency. The storytelling of war experiencing, not “War of memory” but “memory of war”, is on the core of a problem posing.
While “memory of war” only belongs to the people who experienced war, “war of memory” can be shared by the generations who had not experienced war. “War of memory” is a structured discourse which descended or related to war. Both “memory of war” and “war of memory” affect each other, forming a set of discourse.
While “memory of war” is based on the storytelling of war veterans, the storytelling forms “war of memory”, which, as time goes by, makes itself more ardent war discourse than “memory of war”. Furthermore, even people who experienced war seems to structurize his experience as “War of memory” in his brain. In other words, his experience of war slides into the common discourse, “War of memory”. Because memory is not an identification device, which, regardless of social context, interprets or cognizes facts of the past by itself.
It is always problematic that how positive and reasonable this common ownership of war is. Thereby problem is that “War of memory” is a consensus decision ; common memory which are socially stalled memory. So experience of an individual is memorized not by himself but by the tendency. The storytelling of war experiencing, not “War of memory” but “memory of war”, is on the core of a problem posing.
목차
국문초록
1. 전쟁의 기억, 기억의 전쟁
2. 아이의 피난
3. 피난을 받은 피난
4. 바다 피난
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
북한 시장에 대한 문화론적 접근 : 대항문화인가, 하위문화인가
남근우
통일인문학
2014
.06
북한이탈주민과 한국인의 집단적 경계 만들기 또는 은밀한 적대감
전영선
통일인문학
2014
.06
‘전승 60주년’과 북한문학의 표정 : 『조선문학』(2013.7) 소재 소설에 나타난 전쟁기억의 양상
유임하
돈암어문학
2013
.12
북한의 한국전쟁 소설에 나타난 국가서사 : 《조국해방전쟁승리를 위하여》1-4에 수록된 작품을 중심으로
김은정
외국문학연구
2017
.05
관전사(貫戰史)의 관점으로 본 한국전쟁 기억의 두 가지 형식 : 선우휘의 「불꽃」과 하근찬의 「수난이대」를 중심으로
한수영
어문학
2011
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-001-001654082