메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
하영태 (일본 동경대학교)
저널정보
서강대학교 법학연구소 법과기업연구 법과기업연구 제4권 제1호
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
153 - 177 (25page)
DOI
10.35505/sjlb.2014.06.4.1.153

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Countries around the world since 1990, in response to the rapid changes in the economic environment, corporate governance for constantly pushing the legislation. Korea is the transparency and efficiency of corporate management and the economy as part of the democratic debate on corporate governance debate in the academic and actively being silmugye.
Park Geun-hye in July 2013 as part of the government "s economic policy, corporate governance, democratization of the real system in order to improve corporate governance mandates established in the direction of the legislative amendments to the Commercial Code was subject. The purpose of the amendment of directors and audit committee appointed to improve the process, we maintain the function and role of the board, while the executive judicial remedies for misconduct to expand and promote the activation of the general meeting of shareholders by transparent and sound management and corporate culture to build a legal basis for deriving said.
Meanwhile, Japan is desirable corporate governance review and hat on the premise that the maintenance of the company under the laws of our country"s major corporate law reforms ahead began. September 2012 the Council of the General Assembly in legislative deliberation result "Statement on the review of the company not legal" and "bag determination" became final adoption of the Guidelines, the Guidelines on the proposed amendments to the Companies Act November 29, 2013 submitted to the National Assembly for was.
Global age, geographical proximity to Japan and South Korea are the two countries with similar corporate culture through amendments to the Commercial Code and the Companies Act on corporate governance issues and the information appears to be substantially similar. Thus, with respect to the reorganization of corporate governance compared between the two countries is significant in discussing the implications for the country look big.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 대규모회사의 집행임원제의 의무화(한국)
Ⅲ. 감사등위원회설치회사 신설(일본)
Ⅳ. 결론(회사법 개정방향에 대한 시사점)
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-001623494