지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.6
- 수록면
- 153 - 177 (25page)
- DOI
- 10.35505/sjlb.2014.06.4.1.153
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Countries around the world since 1990, in response to the rapid changes in the economic environment, corporate governance for constantly pushing the legislation. Korea is the transparency and efficiency of corporate management and the economy as part of the democratic debate on corporate governance debate in the academic and actively being silmugye.
Park Geun-hye in July 2013 as part of the government "s economic policy, corporate governance, democratization of the real system in order to improve corporate governance mandates established in the direction of the legislative amendments to the Commercial Code was subject. The purpose of the amendment of directors and audit committee appointed to improve the process, we maintain the function and role of the board, while the executive judicial remedies for misconduct to expand and promote the activation of the general meeting of shareholders by transparent and sound management and corporate culture to build a legal basis for deriving said.
Meanwhile, Japan is desirable corporate governance review and hat on the premise that the maintenance of the company under the laws of our country"s major corporate law reforms ahead began. September 2012 the Council of the General Assembly in legislative deliberation result "Statement on the review of the company not legal" and "bag determination" became final adoption of the Guidelines, the Guidelines on the proposed amendments to the Companies Act November 29, 2013 submitted to the National Assembly for was.
Global age, geographical proximity to Japan and South Korea are the two countries with similar corporate culture through amendments to the Commercial Code and the Companies Act on corporate governance issues and the information appears to be substantially similar. Thus, with respect to the reorganization of corporate governance compared between the two countries is significant in discussing the implications for the country look big.
Park Geun-hye in July 2013 as part of the government "s economic policy, corporate governance, democratization of the real system in order to improve corporate governance mandates established in the direction of the legislative amendments to the Commercial Code was subject. The purpose of the amendment of directors and audit committee appointed to improve the process, we maintain the function and role of the board, while the executive judicial remedies for misconduct to expand and promote the activation of the general meeting of shareholders by transparent and sound management and corporate culture to build a legal basis for deriving said.
Meanwhile, Japan is desirable corporate governance review and hat on the premise that the maintenance of the company under the laws of our country"s major corporate law reforms ahead began. September 2012 the Council of the General Assembly in legislative deliberation result "Statement on the review of the company not legal" and "bag determination" became final adoption of the Guidelines, the Guidelines on the proposed amendments to the Companies Act November 29, 2013 submitted to the National Assembly for was.
Global age, geographical proximity to Japan and South Korea are the two countries with similar corporate culture through amendments to the Commercial Code and the Companies Act on corporate governance issues and the information appears to be substantially similar. Thus, with respect to the reorganization of corporate governance compared between the two countries is significant in discussing the implications for the country look big.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 대규모회사의 집행임원제의 의무화(한국)
Ⅲ. 감사등위원회설치회사 신설(일본)
Ⅳ. 결론(회사법 개정방향에 대한 시사점)
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술대회논문] - 권종호 / 2013 / 집행임원제도의 의무화 / 바람직한 기업지배구조 관련 상법개정 방안-2013한국경제연구원 정책세미나 자료
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 양만식 / 2013 / 상법상 다중대표소송제도의 도입에 관한 고찰 / 상사법연구 32 (2) : 269 ~ 307
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이철송 / 2013 / 기업지배구조 관련 입법 추진현황과 과제 / 상장협연구 (68)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 서완석 / 2013 / 집행임원제도의 제한적 의무화에 관한 쟁점사항 검토 / 경제법연구 12 (2) : 65 ~ 95
5. [기타자료] - 정경영 / 2013 / 기업지배구조관련 상법 개정 공청회 / 법무부
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 양만식 / 2013 / 상법상 다중대표소송제도의 도입에 관한 고찰 / 상사법연구 32 (2) : 269 ~ 307
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이철송 / 2013 / 기업지배구조 관련 입법 추진현황과 과제 / 상장협연구 (68)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 서완석 / 2013 / 집행임원제도의 제한적 의무화에 관한 쟁점사항 검토 / 경제법연구 12 (2) : 65 ~ 95
5. [기타자료] - 정경영 / 2013 / 기업지배구조관련 상법 개정 공청회 / 법무부
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-001623494