지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The relationship between trade and environment becomes difficult issues that need to be solved by international society. At an earlier stage of international trade regime marked as the GATT system, environmental issues were not concerns of the GATT system. However, this attitude is dramatically changed by the emergence of the WTO system because dispute settlement mechanism of the WTO has touched upon cases containing complex problems having trade and environmental issues.
However, the attitude of the WTO towards trade and environment issues is acutely criticized by environmentalists because the attitude of the WTO seems to undoubtedly prevails trade interests over environmental interests. Developed countries suggest that more robust policies, which even have possibilities of sacrificing trade interests, should be launched for environmental protection. Reversely, developing countries criticize attitudes of developed countries toward trade and environmental issues as another face of eco-imperialism.
Lessons from the WTO litigation clearly point out that one way approach to trade and environmental issues will not give any feasible answers to both advocates of international trade regime and international environmental regime. Moreover, any attempt to mix international trade regime and international environment regime does not be seen as a relevant way to solve trade and environment issues. For the purpose of solving this hard problems, there is a need to design a brand new comprehensive global governance on trade and environment. By constructing comprehensive global governance on trade and environment, trade and environment issues could be rightly addressed without sacrificing environmental interests. This article tries to explore the possible emergence of comprehensive global governance on trade and environment.
However, the attitude of the WTO towards trade and environment issues is acutely criticized by environmentalists because the attitude of the WTO seems to undoubtedly prevails trade interests over environmental interests. Developed countries suggest that more robust policies, which even have possibilities of sacrificing trade interests, should be launched for environmental protection. Reversely, developing countries criticize attitudes of developed countries toward trade and environmental issues as another face of eco-imperialism.
Lessons from the WTO litigation clearly point out that one way approach to trade and environmental issues will not give any feasible answers to both advocates of international trade regime and international environmental regime. Moreover, any attempt to mix international trade regime and international environment regime does not be seen as a relevant way to solve trade and environment issues. For the purpose of solving this hard problems, there is a need to design a brand new comprehensive global governance on trade and environment. By constructing comprehensive global governance on trade and environment, trade and environment issues could be rightly addressed without sacrificing environmental interests. This article tries to explore the possible emergence of comprehensive global governance on trade and environment.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 환경 관련 국제통상규범체제의 주요 협정 및 기구
Ⅱ. 환경-통상 문제에 대한 국제통상규범체제의 태도
Ⅳ. 환경-통상 관련 포괄적 거버넌스의 수립 필요성 검토
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (50)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
세력확산의 국제정치 : 국제의회네트워크와 글로벌 무역 거버넌스
김치욱
국제정치논총
2015
.03
환경상품의 무역자유화와 환경 · 개발 이익의 조화
심영규
국제경제법연구
2014
.07
The WTO’s Response to International Trade and Environment
LEE EUN-SUP
,
Feng
,
Dong-xu
통상법률
2013
.04
WTO체제하에서 환경보호를 목적으로 한 무역규제의 허용범위에 관한 고찰
전정기
,
이성형
통상법률
2007
.02
Harmonization of Trade and Environment through Judicial Interpretation of General Exceptions under the WTO
LEE EUN-SUP
통상법률
2006
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002484095