지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Features of topic clauses, type of the topic clauses, the relation between the topic clauses- comments were reviewed in this study in pragmatic angle, using the topic clauses which not only appear in the places of subjects but become themes at the same time, as objects of the study. The result of the study for this can be outlined as follows.
First, features of topic clauses were prominently reviewed in three aspects. (1) In the aspect of Topicalization, topic clauses mainly have a feature of ‘base generated topic’. (2) In the aspect of Topic chain, topic clauses can expand the ranges which NP as well as topics can control as topic clauses to a lot of clauses. (3) In the aspect of Aboutness, topic clauses semantically have a feature of ‘aboutness’ on terms with comments. (4) In the aspect of Information, topic clauses either contain old information, or the case can be found as well that they contain new one.
Second, types of topic clauses were roughly classified into 3 types in this study. Direct topic clauses(immediacy), moving topic clauses (movement), generated topic clauses (generative attribute) are those.
Third, specific analysis was tried through each corresponding illustrative sentence with classifying topic clauses-comments relation into determinative relation, remarking relation, explanatory relation, interpretative relation.
Finally in case Chinese topic clauses are translated into Korean, the phenomenon where some can be translated into ‘eun/neun (은/는)’ and some into ‘i/ga(이/가)’ can be inferred from the reason why both of Chinese, Korean have a typical feature of ‘topic-highlighting language’.
First, features of topic clauses were prominently reviewed in three aspects. (1) In the aspect of Topicalization, topic clauses mainly have a feature of ‘base generated topic’. (2) In the aspect of Topic chain, topic clauses can expand the ranges which NP as well as topics can control as topic clauses to a lot of clauses. (3) In the aspect of Aboutness, topic clauses semantically have a feature of ‘aboutness’ on terms with comments. (4) In the aspect of Information, topic clauses either contain old information, or the case can be found as well that they contain new one.
Second, types of topic clauses were roughly classified into 3 types in this study. Direct topic clauses(immediacy), moving topic clauses (movement), generated topic clauses (generative attribute) are those.
Third, specific analysis was tried through each corresponding illustrative sentence with classifying topic clauses-comments relation into determinative relation, remarking relation, explanatory relation, interpretative relation.
Finally in case Chinese topic clauses are translated into Korean, the phenomenon where some can be translated into ‘eun/neun (은/는)’ and some into ‘i/ga(이/가)’ can be inferred from the reason why both of Chinese, Korean have a typical feature of ‘topic-highlighting language’.
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 주제절의 특징
3. 주제절의 유형
4. 주제절과 평언의 관계
5. 주제절의 한국어 표현방식
6. 나오며
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0