지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is concerned with Chinese adjective-object predicate clauses that is relevant to transitivity. This paper clarify that transitivity is a continuous system so all sentences can have transitivity, only have difference of transitivity degree between them, therefore we claim the Adjective-object predicate clauses also have their own Transitivity. To support this we’re-examine the prototypical features of transitivity studied by many scholars, and find out the Adjective-object predicate clauses has two Participants with the syntax, which shows the basic Transitivity.
However Adjective is [-Action] feature so the subject of this clauses cannot have a controlling of action, but have responsible/volition for change. This is the main difference between the general transitivity sentence (verb predicate) and its.
However Adjective is [-Action] feature so the subject of this clauses cannot have a controlling of action, but have responsible/volition for change. This is the main difference between the general transitivity sentence (verb predicate) and its.
목차
1. 서론
2. 타동성
3. 빈어수반 일음절 형용사 서술어문의 타동성
4. 나가며
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0