지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.8
- 수록면
- 121 - 146 (26page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One of the most controversial issues in the initial response to Bernard Shaw’s 1913 play, Pygmalion: A Romance in Five Acts, is the playwright’s persistent refusal to provide his audience with a romantic union between Higgins and Eliza. Unlike the classical myth about Pygmalion and Galatea, whose destiny, including love and marriage, was entirely controlled by the god Aphrodite, the twentieth-century version of Shaw’s retelling of the story boldly breaks away from the magical, sentimental notion of a “happy ending.” As a professor of phonetics, Higgins represents the problematic signs of modernity, particularly his preoccupation with a mechanical system of enlightenment to educate the lower class out of ignorance and irrationality. Shaw uses the term “romance” with a sense of irony to point out that the magical, supernatural and idealistic transformation is no longer possible, nor even probable, in the twentieth century. Instead, Pygmalion espouses the message that society needs counter-modernity, with a re-established awareness of ethics and social responsibilities encompassing the rigid class binaries. Eliza, as an embodiment of counter-modernity, is a character through whom Shaw advocates emergence of a new social class that is morally healthy, self-reliant and economically and culturally independent.
목차
I. 서론
II. 20세기 버전 피그말리온 에 드러난 모더니티
III. 반낭만적 로맨스
IV. 전환기 근대적 주체로서의 여성
V. 결론
인용 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-840-002619008