지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper views varying political and public reactions to creating a system wherein each spouse is allowed to have his or her own separate surname. By analyzing congressional records, surveys of political parties and congressional members, and public polls, the study reveals some fundamental differences in the ways that advocates and critics of the new system perceive the issue.
The critics do not want to adopt the new system because it has potential to both split public opinion and weaken familial connections. The advocates, on the other hand, hold that the new system could promote gender equality, relieve women’s struggles, protect minority rights, and introduce more diverse values to the society.
As for public opinion, more people have rejected the idea in surveys since 1976, when the government ran its first public poll on the topic. In addition, only about 5 to 7% of the respondents have said that they would use their own surnames if they can.
Subsequently, the policy should instead be pursued in the context of preserving rights for the minority of people who want their own surnames. Civil and women’s rights organizations, while working hand in hand with political advocates, should take leading roles in generating broad public support for the system. Politically, a party backing the policy could strengthen its position by running campaigns against its congressional candidates who do not endorse the new system. Efforts should be made in the academic realm as well, where increased awareness of the topic could generate a favorable atmosphere for spouses who want to use their own surnames.
The critics do not want to adopt the new system because it has potential to both split public opinion and weaken familial connections. The advocates, on the other hand, hold that the new system could promote gender equality, relieve women’s struggles, protect minority rights, and introduce more diverse values to the society.
As for public opinion, more people have rejected the idea in surveys since 1976, when the government ran its first public poll on the topic. In addition, only about 5 to 7% of the respondents have said that they would use their own surnames if they can.
Subsequently, the policy should instead be pursued in the context of preserving rights for the minority of people who want their own surnames. Civil and women’s rights organizations, while working hand in hand with political advocates, should take leading roles in generating broad public support for the system. Politically, a party backing the policy could strengthen its position by running campaigns against its congressional candidates who do not endorse the new system. Efforts should be made in the academic realm as well, where increased awareness of the topic could generate a favorable atmosphere for spouses who want to use their own surnames.
목차
서론
제1장 선택적부부별성제도의 추진과정
제2장 선택적부부별성제도에 대한 정치권의 의식변화
제3장 선택적부부별성제도에 대한 국민의 의식변화
결론
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
고려 말 조선 초 재정 구조의 연속성과 공납제 운영
소순규
역사비평
2017
.08
『世宗實錄』 地理志를 통해 본 朝鮮初 貢物 分定의 실제와 특성 : 厥貢ㆍ土貢ㆍ土産 항목의 검토를 중심으로
蘇淳圭
한국사연구
2013
.06
당·송·고려·조선의 종묘 친협형의와 건축형식 비교 연구 ( A Comparative Study on the Rituals and Architectural Form of Royal Ancestral Shrine in the periods of Tang, Song, Koryo and ChoSun Dynasty )
정기철
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2001
.10
[정욱 특파원의 일본열도 통신] 선택적 부부 별성제로 시끄러운 日
정욱
매경럭스맨
2020
.03
명명에 관한 연구 : 한국과 일본의 성씨와 가칭명의 운용
장상언
일어일문학
2007
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-002606222