지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 153 (153page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background of Research
The inter-Korean agricultural cooperation executed in the 2000s is made up of three types of cooperation as follows: humanitarian aid by the government and civil society, development assistance by local government and civil society, and economic cooperation by enterprises. A number of accomplishments were made through the cooperation. First, the North Koreans" humanitarian situation has partially improved through food assistance. Second, agricultural productivity has increased through agricultural inputs such as fertilizer and technological assistance. Third, the South and the North learned lessons that strategic agricultural cooperation is required to improve the effectiveness of cooperation. However, several reflective points can be made to improve the effectiveness of inter-Korean agricultural cooperation.
Method of Research
We failed to set clear goals and targets for the cooperation. As a result, we could not develop methods to strategically aid when executing the programs. We did not reflect the changes in the situation coming from the special relationship between the two Koreas and the circumstances surrounding the Korean peninsula to our programs. We did not prepare alternatives for unforeseen situations. We did not sufficiently consider internal conflict among our people. We have to overcome the past failure when we start new programs. The goal of this study is to find and offer customized agricultural cooperation programs to North Korea.
Research Results and Implications
Implementation of the effectiveness agenda regarding inter-Korean agricultural cooperation follows, first, focusing on aid effectiveness and sustainability of outcome across all areas of the aid program and, second, using the customized cooperation approach to increase aid effectiveness of agricultural cooperation. We have identified three types of cafeteria cooperation programs suitable for North Korea. The first is the most frequent type of cooperation which reflects current economic situation and resource endowment of North Korea. The second type is an ownership induced cooperation which supports North Korea"s agricultural polices and needs. The third type is a leading cooperation which induces opening doors and economic reform in North Korea. This study suggests 8 programs, such as rural development behind special zones, and 17 projects such as the expansion of potato production for agricultural cooperation with North Korea.
This study suggests four effectiveness principles for the customized agricultural cooperation. The most important is to set clear goals and to approach with a strategy. Second, a sustainable outcome is a key component of effective aid. Third, strengthening the capacity is the core idea for both parties participating in the cooperation. Fourth, good governance is strongly emphasized to achieve effective cooperation. Fifth, expanding partnerships among the government, aid providers and enterprises.
The inter-Korean agricultural cooperation executed in the 2000s is made up of three types of cooperation as follows: humanitarian aid by the government and civil society, development assistance by local government and civil society, and economic cooperation by enterprises. A number of accomplishments were made through the cooperation. First, the North Koreans" humanitarian situation has partially improved through food assistance. Second, agricultural productivity has increased through agricultural inputs such as fertilizer and technological assistance. Third, the South and the North learned lessons that strategic agricultural cooperation is required to improve the effectiveness of cooperation. However, several reflective points can be made to improve the effectiveness of inter-Korean agricultural cooperation.
Method of Research
We failed to set clear goals and targets for the cooperation. As a result, we could not develop methods to strategically aid when executing the programs. We did not reflect the changes in the situation coming from the special relationship between the two Koreas and the circumstances surrounding the Korean peninsula to our programs. We did not prepare alternatives for unforeseen situations. We did not sufficiently consider internal conflict among our people. We have to overcome the past failure when we start new programs. The goal of this study is to find and offer customized agricultural cooperation programs to North Korea.
Research Results and Implications
Implementation of the effectiveness agenda regarding inter-Korean agricultural cooperation follows, first, focusing on aid effectiveness and sustainability of outcome across all areas of the aid program and, second, using the customized cooperation approach to increase aid effectiveness of agricultural cooperation. We have identified three types of cafeteria cooperation programs suitable for North Korea. The first is the most frequent type of cooperation which reflects current economic situation and resource endowment of North Korea. The second type is an ownership induced cooperation which supports North Korea"s agricultural polices and needs. The third type is a leading cooperation which induces opening doors and economic reform in North Korea. This study suggests 8 programs, such as rural development behind special zones, and 17 projects such as the expansion of potato production for agricultural cooperation with North Korea.
This study suggests four effectiveness principles for the customized agricultural cooperation. The most important is to set clear goals and to approach with a strategy. Second, a sustainable outcome is a key component of effective aid. Third, strengthening the capacity is the core idea for both parties participating in the cooperation. Fourth, good governance is strongly emphasized to achieve effective cooperation. Fifth, expanding partnerships among the government, aid providers and enterprises.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
연구목적
연구개발 내용
연구결과 및 시사점
[ABSTRACT]
Background of Research
Method of Research
Research Results and Implications
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구배경
2. 연구의 필요성과 목적
3. 선행연구 검토와 주요 연구 내용
[제2장 대북 농업교류협력과 평가]
1. 대북 농업교류협력의 전개
2. 대북 농업교류협력의 평가
[제3장 북한 맞춤형 농업개발협력의 유형과 구상]
1. 유형 구분을 위한 고려사항
2. 북한의 상황과 농업개발협력 수요
3. 북한 맞춤형 농업개발협력의 구상
[제4장 북한 맞춤형 농업개발협력 프로그램]
1. 식량공급 증대 프로그램
2. 농업기반 복구 프로그램
3. 축산 협력 프로그램
4. 산림복구 및 환경보호 협력 프로그램
5. 지속가능한 에너지 개발 프로그램
6. 취약계층을 위한 자급농장(소토지농사) 지원 프로그램
7. 특구 배후지 농업개발협력 프로그램
[제5장 북한 맞춤형 농업개발협력 추진 방안: 협력체계 구축을 중심으로]
1. 협력체계 구축의 필요성
2. 정부·민간단체 협력체계의 구성
3. 지원 대상 사업의 선정, 모니터링, 평가체계
4. 기타 고려해야 할 사항
[제6장 요약 및 제언]
1. 연구의 필요성과 목적
2. 대북 농업교류협력의 평가와 과제
3. 북한 맞춤형 농업개발협력사업의 도출과 유형 구분
4. 농업개발협력 프로그램과 세부 프로젝트
5. 추진체계
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0