메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
안대환 (선문대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第30卷 第10號
발행연도
2014.10
수록면
123 - 132 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare with the elevation composition of Underwood hall, Appenzeller hall, Stimson hall in Yonsei university. Yonsei university is the representative higher educational institution which had been made by Western missionaries during the Japanese colonial period. Especially, these buildings had been designed by the master plan which had been made before the consturction. So, these buildings have a lot of similarities that used the same elevation composition elements as Tudor gothic style (four-centered arch, bay window, square window, decorative chimney, tower and so on). On the other side, each building has individual characteristics. Because they used the elevation composition elements using by the different methods and location.
Elevation composition elements give the visual stability by symmetric location to both sides of building. And elevation composition elements give the visual centrality by location to the center of the building. As a result, the front elevation emphasize the visual stability and centrality. On the other side, the rear elevation of Underwood hall and Stimson hall has asymmetry and tension because some buildings located the back of Underwood hall and Stimson hall. Also, the left side elevation of Stimson hall has more decorative elements than the right side elevation because the street was located the left side of the Stimson hall.
The elevation composition of these buildings shows that the planning method of western universities had applied to these buildings in Korea and western missionaries had kept the plan of western universities as possible as they can. These buildings have the similarities because of the master plan and using the same elevation composition elements. Also each building had their own individual characteristics with the different method and location of elevation composition elements.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 연혁 및 배치
3. 입면구성
4. 입면구성요소 사용 위치의 비교
5. 입면구성의 특징
6. 마스터플랜과 입면구성의 관계
7. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0