지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study was intended to verify the validity in category establishment of semantically conditioned alternation, with the focus on the alternation between the noun affix "-e" and "-ege." To do this, this study explicated the concept of alternation between alternants and the condition of alternation, with semantically conditioned alternation as the central figure. An allomorph is a variant form of a morpheme, and this concept occurs when a unit of meaning can vary in sound without changing meaning. The term allomorph explains phonological variations for specific morphemes. It might be true that the variation may be conditioned by the phonological, morphological, and semantic environment. But doubts have been expressed about semantically conditioned alternation. This is because a lot of people think semantically conditioned alternation has no semantic identity between alternants. However, in fact, this type of alternation has semantic identity as with other alternations. In this regard, this paper inquires the concept of alternation from a general viewpoint, and argues for the validity in category establishment of semantically conditioned alternation.
목차
1. 서론
2. ‘에’와 ‘에게’의 관계
3. 형태 교체의 조건
4. 의미론적 이형태 범주의 설정
5. 결론
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-700-002701115