메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
전문잡지
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 건축 建築 第58卷 第12號
발행연도
2014.11
수록면
16 - 19 (4page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The reason why the fairness of architecture becomes a subject of debate is based on the present realization of “Architecture of the very moment here is not fair” and the theory of duty that “Architecture must be fair.” However, why should architecture be fair when it is not a scale or a legal sentence? Major design firms using a sales gimmick of elaborate computer graphics or preposterous diagrams may be criticized, but the responsibility of the public and the academism who accepted and aggravated such tactics is more essential in this issue.
Due to the sudden rise of the global capitalism since the 1990s, the cadastral service market, including architecture, was also under opening pressure. Thus, the government offered a preferential condition of Turnkey system for the construction companies in a just cause of coping with the sudden opening, a trigger that ultimately spoiled the present architectural design market. Most public architecture projects have been procured under turnkey system that architecture happened to living off the construction companies and the capital. Even the autonomously emerging field of discourses in Korean public architecture became bewildered. By-products of this circumstance include the emergence of major design firms and their monopolization of even design competitions. As a result, our architecture fell an easy prey to the global architecture market, and our architectural ecosystem collapsed.
Considering the last two decades as the lost period of Korean architecture, we should take courage to go back to the starting point. We have nothing to lose anymore, and we still have the outstanding work force grown in the 1990s as the next generation. Another encouraging outcome is the ‘Act on the Promotion of Architectural Services Industry’ that our architectural field achieved in one accord. Finally, architecture freed itself from the recognition as a service industry under the construction field, and it is ready to make a new leap forward an independent knowledge industry.
On top of these external and internal factors, architects should reconsider ‘Architecture with Theories,’ and an academism should arrange ‘Discourses of Architecture in Korea’; both neglected for a while.

목차

건축의 공정성
우리의 건축은 공공적이지 않다.
우리의 사회는 공정하지 않다.
다시 근본으로
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-500-002637641