지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The reason why the fairness of architecture becomes a subject of debate is based on the present realization of “Architecture of the very moment here is not fair” and the theory of duty that “Architecture must be fair.” However, why should architecture be fair when it is not a scale or a legal sentence? Major design firms using a sales gimmick of elaborate computer graphics or preposterous diagrams may be criticized, but the responsibility of the public and the academism who accepted and aggravated such tactics is more essential in this issue.
Due to the sudden rise of the global capitalism since the 1990s, the cadastral service market, including architecture, was also under opening pressure. Thus, the government offered a preferential condition of Turnkey system for the construction companies in a just cause of coping with the sudden opening, a trigger that ultimately spoiled the present architectural design market. Most public architecture projects have been procured under turnkey system that architecture happened to living off the construction companies and the capital. Even the autonomously emerging field of discourses in Korean public architecture became bewildered. By-products of this circumstance include the emergence of major design firms and their monopolization of even design competitions. As a result, our architecture fell an easy prey to the global architecture market, and our architectural ecosystem collapsed.
Considering the last two decades as the lost period of Korean architecture, we should take courage to go back to the starting point. We have nothing to lose anymore, and we still have the outstanding work force grown in the 1990s as the next generation. Another encouraging outcome is the ‘Act on the Promotion of Architectural Services Industry’ that our architectural field achieved in one accord. Finally, architecture freed itself from the recognition as a service industry under the construction field, and it is ready to make a new leap forward an independent knowledge industry.
On top of these external and internal factors, architects should reconsider ‘Architecture with Theories,’ and an academism should arrange ‘Discourses of Architecture in Korea’; both neglected for a while.
Due to the sudden rise of the global capitalism since the 1990s, the cadastral service market, including architecture, was also under opening pressure. Thus, the government offered a preferential condition of Turnkey system for the construction companies in a just cause of coping with the sudden opening, a trigger that ultimately spoiled the present architectural design market. Most public architecture projects have been procured under turnkey system that architecture happened to living off the construction companies and the capital. Even the autonomously emerging field of discourses in Korean public architecture became bewildered. By-products of this circumstance include the emergence of major design firms and their monopolization of even design competitions. As a result, our architecture fell an easy prey to the global architecture market, and our architectural ecosystem collapsed.
Considering the last two decades as the lost period of Korean architecture, we should take courage to go back to the starting point. We have nothing to lose anymore, and we still have the outstanding work force grown in the 1990s as the next generation. Another encouraging outcome is the ‘Act on the Promotion of Architectural Services Industry’ that our architectural field achieved in one accord. Finally, architecture freed itself from the recognition as a service industry under the construction field, and it is ready to make a new leap forward an independent knowledge industry.
On top of these external and internal factors, architects should reconsider ‘Architecture with Theories,’ and an academism should arrange ‘Discourses of Architecture in Korea’; both neglected for a while.
목차
건축의 공정성
우리의 건축은 공공적이지 않다.
우리의 사회는 공정하지 않다.
다시 근본으로
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
건축사의 사회적 역할
이명식
건축과사회
2005
.07
공공성 회복을 통한 지방 소도시 구도심재생 연구 : 역사, 문화, 생태 도시 완주군 고산을 사례로
윤성훈
,
윤희진
KIEAE Journal
2015
.06
종교건축물의 공간변용(空間變用) 고찰 : 조계사, 명동성당, 정동제일교회를 중심으로
백지원
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2014
.05
천주교 광주교구 성당건축의 특성에 관한 연구 : 광주·전남지역 성당을 중심으로 건축요소별 분석
강형주
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2014
.10
랜드스케이프 건축을 통한 도시 경계에서의 공공성 확보에 관한 연구
안지현
,
구영민
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
2010
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-500-002637641