지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 1908, the Japanese imperialism planed abolition of conception of the settlement, after then it is confirmed that they attempted to change in charge of the task. Abolishing the settlement system and trying to reorganize a unitary administration intended to charge the cost of public facilities to foreigners and Koreans. However, the law of settlement corporation could be abolished after merger because it was the laws only forced to a foreign settlement. A settlement corporation aware of this fact carried out premature theory not opposeed to abolish of a settlement corporation. Differences in the level of Korean and Japanese, hindrance of privilege of Japanese immigrants, etc. was issued. The Government General caused uselessness of a settlement corporation about these issues. The reason was that was nothing more than training minor officials institutions. Human Resources of the Government General emphasized that administrative district system was only for Japanese in the cost. Japanese had only paid for the cost of public facilities was extended to Koreans and foreigners.
Japanese Settlement in Korea had predicted the abolition of their corporation. So, they had requested alternative independent organization. Nominally, they had asserted their contribution for Japanese immigration and settlement. The abolition of the corporation had been related with permission of political intervention. Japanese Settlement Corporation had argued maintenance of independent organization but, the corporation had gone out of force officially. August, 1913, the Japanese Government General of Korea had announced policy for an administrative district(Pusystem) to disapprove the independent organization.
Officially, independent organization had been disapproved. But, succeeding independent organization had been run consistently in Kyung-Sung, Bu-San, etc. Similarly. Pu-Council(Pu-hyopeuhoi) had replaced the position of Japanese Settlement Corporation under the authorities of the Japanese Government General of Korea. Partially, self-governing in Japanese settlement had been persisted.
In conclusion, Japanese Settlement Corporation had raised trouble with the Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General ostensibly. But, on the other hand, Japanese Settlement Corporation had lend Japanese a helping hand for residence and settlement in colonial Korea with assisstance from the Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General. Japanese Settlement Corporation had represented profit of Japanese settlement and justified their position. Contrast with Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General, Japanese Settlement Coropration had conducted invasion policies in other ways.
Japanese Settlement in Korea had predicted the abolition of their corporation. So, they had requested alternative independent organization. Nominally, they had asserted their contribution for Japanese immigration and settlement. The abolition of the corporation had been related with permission of political intervention. Japanese Settlement Corporation had argued maintenance of independent organization but, the corporation had gone out of force officially. August, 1913, the Japanese Government General of Korea had announced policy for an administrative district(Pusystem) to disapprove the independent organization.
Officially, independent organization had been disapproved. But, succeeding independent organization had been run consistently in Kyung-Sung, Bu-San, etc. Similarly. Pu-Council(Pu-hyopeuhoi) had replaced the position of Japanese Settlement Corporation under the authorities of the Japanese Government General of Korea. Partially, self-governing in Japanese settlement had been persisted.
In conclusion, Japanese Settlement Corporation had raised trouble with the Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General ostensibly. But, on the other hand, Japanese Settlement Corporation had lend Japanese a helping hand for residence and settlement in colonial Korea with assisstance from the Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General. Japanese Settlement Corporation had represented profit of Japanese settlement and justified their position. Contrast with Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General, Japanese Settlement Coropration had conducted invasion policies in other ways.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 거류민단의 성장과 일제의 거류지제도 개편 계획
Ⅱ. 거류민단의 폐지와 일본인 사회의 재편
Ⅲ. 부제 실시 이후 재한일본인 사회의 동향
맺음말
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (59)
참고문헌 신청
천지명 / 2014 / 통감부의 재한일본인 정책과 거류민단의 변화 / 한국민족운동사연구 (79):5~52
천지명 / 2014 / 재한일본인 거류민단(1906-1914) 연구
홍순권 / 2004 / 일제시기 부제의 실시와 지방제도 개정의 추이 / 지역과 역사 0(14):241~281
홍순권 / 2006 / 1910-20년대 부산부협의회의 구성과 지방정치- 협의원의 임명과 선거 실태 분석을 중심으로 - / 역사와경계 (60):177~219
박양신 / 2012 / 재한일본인 거류민단의 성립과 해체 ─ 러일전쟁 이후 일본인 거류지의 발전과 식민지 통치기반의 형성 ─ / 아시아문화연구 26:241~272
천지명 / 2014 / 재한일본인 거류민단(1906-1914) 연구
홍순권 / 2004 / 일제시기 부제의 실시와 지방제도 개정의 추이 / 지역과 역사 0(14):241~281
홍순권 / 2006 / 1910-20년대 부산부협의회의 구성과 지방정치- 협의원의 임명과 선거 실태 분석을 중심으로 - / 역사와경계 (60):177~219
박양신 / 2012 / 재한일본인 거류민단의 성립과 해체 ─ 러일전쟁 이후 일본인 거류지의 발전과 식민지 통치기반의 형성 ─ / 아시아문화연구 26:241~272
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-002815150