지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After World War II, the repatriation of Japanese and non Japanese was an issue between the Soviet Union and the GHQ. All of the detained Japanese were able to repatriate to their homeland due to the Repatriation Agreement between the Soviet Union and the GHQ in 1946 and the Agreement between the Soviet Union and the Japanese Government in 1956. But the detained Koreans in Sakhalin could not repatriate to the Korean peninsula because they had lost Japanese nationality at the time of the San Francisco Treaty. The Japanese government made no efforts for the detained Koreans, regarding them as non Japanese although they had moved to Sakhalin as Japanese civilians during the period of Japanese rule.
After the 1960s, the Japanese government began to negotiate with the Soviet Union for the repatriation of detained Koreans, because there were no diplomatic relations between South Korea and the Soviet Union. But the Japanese government asked the Korean government for an important premise: “The Korean government should secure settlement of Koreans repatriated from Sakhalin(including those people repatriated via Japan), and repatriation expenses, too.” This was the basic policy of the Japanese government. In 1972, Prime Minister Tanaka Kakuei reconfirmed this policy. But the Korean government insisted on the opposite, that detained Koreans should settle in Japan and all the expenses should be paid by the Japanese government. And the Soviet Union declared that it would not permit embarkation to South Korea. The place of settlement for the detained Koreans was a high hurdle for diplomatic negotiations among the three countries during the 1960s and the 1970s.
After the 1960s, the Japanese government began to negotiate with the Soviet Union for the repatriation of detained Koreans, because there were no diplomatic relations between South Korea and the Soviet Union. But the Japanese government asked the Korean government for an important premise: “The Korean government should secure settlement of Koreans repatriated from Sakhalin(including those people repatriated via Japan), and repatriation expenses, too.” This was the basic policy of the Japanese government. In 1972, Prime Minister Tanaka Kakuei reconfirmed this policy. But the Korean government insisted on the opposite, that detained Koreans should settle in Japan and all the expenses should be paid by the Japanese government. And the Soviet Union declared that it would not permit embarkation to South Korea. The place of settlement for the detained Koreans was a high hurdle for diplomatic negotiations among the three countries during the 1960s and the 1970s.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 일본정부의 사할린한인 귀환문제 인식틀(1945~1965)
Ⅲ. 일본정부의 주요 교섭활동 내용(1965~1976)
Ⅳ. 다나카 수상과 이나바 법무상의 의회 답변
Ⅴ. 외교교섭 정체기 일본정부의 대응(1976~1983)
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-900-000941602