지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 257 - 278 (22page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
John Patrick Shanley’s Doubt: A Parable(2005), a play and film, opens with Father Flynn’s line “What do you do when you’re not sure?” Well-known for winning the Pulitzer Prize in 2005, this play aims to show the gap between certainty and doubt by contrasting religious characters including Father Flynn, Sister Aloysius and Sister James. The political background in its setting is one during various civil rights movements for minorities like African Americans and women during the 1960s. As indicated in the title, this play has a sub-title, ‘a parable’. According to Mark Turner, a parable, a source for many stories, is connected with the operation and production of a person’s doubt stemmed from her distorted perspectives and recognition. Doubt as a title and main theme of Shanley’s play, which was filmed, operates as an element of numerous scattered doubts. It is symbolized by feathers that are thrown into the sky by a woman who cut a pillow on a rooftop. Doubts like feathers from a pillow floating in the air cannot be grasped but spread quickly to any place. In this vein, doubt arises from the contexts made up of rhetorical tension. Also, contextual meaning is coined by functions of the signifier and cognition. Sister Aloysius’s conjectures based on doubt motivate to expel Father Flynn from the parish by accusing him of homosexuality and pedophilia. In the end, Sister Aloysius approved her stance by saying “I have doubts. I have such doubts.” Therefore, doubt as a signifier, woven like a parable, has operated like political offense and defense by producing other groundless doubts. Also, the mechanics of doubt can cause relationships to be broken; moreover, doubts lead to the lack of communication between characters. Thus it is recognized that the signifier ‘doubt’ has a tremendous power to produce far more doubts through human cognitive operations and results in a huge gap between them.
목차
I. 서론
II. 이분법적 관계의 양상
III. 의심이라는 기표와 인지작용
IV. 소통의 부재라는 의심
V. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-842-001022683