지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 281 - 290 (10page)
- DOI
- 10.14815/kjdm.2014.41.4.281
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)
2016
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of shear bond strength and microleakage between dentin and dentin adhesive system after application of dentin desensitizers. Ten desensitizers (UltraEZ, Gluma Desensitizer, MicroPrime G, Systemp desensitizer, SuperSeal, BisBlock, MS-Coat One, Seal&Protect, HurriSeal and Zarosen) were evaluated. Each desensitizer was applied to the dentinal surface and composite resin (Filtek Z-250) was bonded to dentin using dentin adhesive system (Scotchbond MultiPurpose). Then, shear bond strength was measured using an universal testing machine. For microleakage test, class V cavities were prepared and cavities were restored with composite resin using dentin bonding agent after desensitizers application. The data were analyzed using t-test and Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons test (p=0.05). There were no statistical differences in bond strength between the control (24.23 MPa) and the experimental groups treated with HurriSeal (24.99 MPa), Zarosen (24.13 MPa), Gluma Desensitizer (22.44 MPa), MicroPrime G (21.64 MPa), Systemp desensitizer (19.15 MPa), MS-Coat (18.64 MPa), UltraEZ (18.17 MPa). The experimental groups with Seal&Protect (11.71 MPa), SuperSeal (9.12 MPa), BisBlock (8.66 MPa) yielded significantly lower bond strength than the control. There were no statistical differences in microleakage between control group and the experimental groups except for groups treated with SuperSeal and BisBlock.
목차
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
연구 재료 및 방법
연구 결과
총괄 및 고찰
결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-515-000941043