메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Hahm, Chung-Hae (Ewha Womans’ University)
저널정보
한국여성체육학회 한국여성체육학회지 한국여성체육학회지 제28권 제4호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
221 - 239 (19page)
DOI
10.16915/jkapesgw.2014.12.28.4.221

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purposes of this study were three fold: (1) to examine university elite athletes’ moral and socal value reasoning differences depending on the general descriptive characteristics (gender, age, how long he/she participated in sport), (2) to examine the consistence if questions about perceived moral action correlate with moral reasoning on the RSBH, and (3) to validate the Korean version of the RSBH Value Judgement Inventory. We randomly selected sample as 122 university elite athletes. The translated instrument used was the RSBH, a valid and reliable US instrument to measure moral and social value reasoning. The females had significantly higher scores with moral value reasoning than males. Using ANOVA, we found there were no significant differences among answers related with moral value reasoning. There were significantly differences between their perceptions of how they play and with moral reasoning scores. In conclusions, the university elite athletes appear not to follow sportsmanship and fair play when they actually play game, even though they thought that they have to play with sportsmanship and fair play.

목차

ABSTRACT
I. Introduction
Ⅱ. Methods
Ⅲ. Results and Discussion
Ⅳ. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-692-000954653