지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 687 - 711 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Honest Whore Part 2 by Dekker and Measure for Measure by Shakespeare are comparable in many ways, as both plays dramatize how a society responds to social disruption. Among others, main actions of both plays are triggered by dramatized versions of James’s proclamation to clean out the London suburbs right after his ascension to the English throne in 1603. In addition, both of them represent sexual transgression as a primary cause of social disorder. However, the ways each play tackles the social problems are quite different. At the center of the difference lies how each ruler’s authority is constructed and exerted. Shakespeare’s duke is a ruler with absolute power and at the center of every authority in the state. His concern is keeping his subjects and country in order. Even if his authority is sometimes problematized, there is no denying that he is an efficient ruler building an absolute authority by his own means and maneuvers. On the other hand, Dekker’s duke is close to a Machiavellian ruler in that he wields his power more arbitrarily to further his daughter’s interests. Orlando Friscobaldo, an ordinary civilian, takes his place and plays the part of problem-solver by disguising himself, coordinating the relationship among characters, and distributing rewards and punishments according to their virtue and misdeeds. However, his solution must be finally ratified by a ruler with supreme power. Interestingly, Dekker implies that a ruler’s authority must be supported by a civic institution as well as his subjects’ integrity by setting his final scene in Bridewell, a civic house of correction. In summary, the difference in the characterization of dukes helps audience to understand Shakespeare’s and Dekker’s ideological orientation towards the way social problems of their age should be tackled.
목차
Ⅰ. 제임스 1세의 교외 일소령(1603년)의 극화
Ⅱ. 지배자의 권위?빈센시오와 트레밧찌
Ⅲ. 사회의 질서 회복을 위한 군주의 역할
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-840-000980084