지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 45 - 80 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.35505/sjlb.2014.12.4.2.45
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 2013, India became the first country in the world to mandate Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) spending as the new Companies Act of 2013 requires companies of a certain size to invest two-percent of net profits in social welfare activities. While philanthropic CSR efforts have been viewed as discretionary and voluntary engagements undertaken by corporations around the world, a new CSR model is emerging in India.
This Article analyzes the emerging CSR regime in India and highlights key characteristics of the developing frameworks. It begins an overview of the new Companies Act of 2013, and corporate governance reform to understand backgrounds of CSR regime in India. It, then, reviews CSR requirements under section 135 of the Act. This Article raises questions about why India is moving towards mandatory philanthropic CSR and whether this regime could be a leading model to other countries. By reviewing lessons from Indian example of CSR implementation, it seeks to add to Korean legal debates over CSR regime. Finally, this Article suggests a legislative blueprint for establishing a foundation to effectively implement CSR in corporate jurisprudence.
Unlike India, Korea does not have explicit CSR legislation in the corporate law context. But while there is no law directly mandating CSR in Korea, numerous regulations governing corporate activities already fulfill the function of implementing CSR. Such individual regulatory statutes, which require or encourage certain “results,” “actions/processes,” and “structures” of corporate activities for protecting various stakeholders in the economic, social, and environmental dimensions, would be an effective mechanism for implementing CSR.
In this respect, the Indian 2013 Companies Act, which mandates two-percent company spending on CSR, is likely to suffer from a severely delimited consideration of CSR, i.e., as a philanthropic responsibility, if India fails to arrange a systematic legislative framework for improving CSR practice to protect society from corporate abuses. Becoming the first country to incorporate mandatory philanthropic CSR could burnish the image of India as a leader in improving CSR; but it could also isolate the country from the international consensus. Perhaps a more desirable route to becoming such a leader would involve establishing a systemic and effective legal framework considering sphere of influence in CSR with economic, environmental, and social dimensions, in line with a CSR-centric perspective, i.e., economic, legal, and ethical responsibilities before moving on mandating philanthropic CSR by a single regulation.
This Article analyzes the emerging CSR regime in India and highlights key characteristics of the developing frameworks. It begins an overview of the new Companies Act of 2013, and corporate governance reform to understand backgrounds of CSR regime in India. It, then, reviews CSR requirements under section 135 of the Act. This Article raises questions about why India is moving towards mandatory philanthropic CSR and whether this regime could be a leading model to other countries. By reviewing lessons from Indian example of CSR implementation, it seeks to add to Korean legal debates over CSR regime. Finally, this Article suggests a legislative blueprint for establishing a foundation to effectively implement CSR in corporate jurisprudence.
Unlike India, Korea does not have explicit CSR legislation in the corporate law context. But while there is no law directly mandating CSR in Korea, numerous regulations governing corporate activities already fulfill the function of implementing CSR. Such individual regulatory statutes, which require or encourage certain “results,” “actions/processes,” and “structures” of corporate activities for protecting various stakeholders in the economic, social, and environmental dimensions, would be an effective mechanism for implementing CSR.
In this respect, the Indian 2013 Companies Act, which mandates two-percent company spending on CSR, is likely to suffer from a severely delimited consideration of CSR, i.e., as a philanthropic responsibility, if India fails to arrange a systematic legislative framework for improving CSR practice to protect society from corporate abuses. Becoming the first country to incorporate mandatory philanthropic CSR could burnish the image of India as a leader in improving CSR; but it could also isolate the country from the international consensus. Perhaps a more desirable route to becoming such a leader would involve establishing a systemic and effective legal framework considering sphere of influence in CSR with economic, environmental, and social dimensions, in line with a CSR-centric perspective, i.e., economic, legal, and ethical responsibilities before moving on mandating philanthropic CSR by a single regulation.
목차
I. 서론
Ⅱ. 회사법 개정과 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR) 법제화
Ⅲ. CSR 지출 의무의 회사법적 고찰
VI. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (39)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
지속가능경영을 위한 기업의 환경적, 사회적, 지배구조적 요인이 주가수익률 및 기업 가치에 미치는 영향
민재형
,
김범석
,
하승인
한국경영과학회지
2014
.11
기업의 사회적 책임활동이 기업이미지 및 구매의도에 미치는 영향
정은송
,
김도희
,
박병진
대한경영학회 학술발표대회 발표논문집
2014
.05
전략적 제휴의 진화에 따른 교섭력 및 제휴성과 변화에 관한 연구 : 국내 진출 다국적 제약사 사례를 중심으로
유완진
,
이윤철
전략경영연구
2015
.04
바이럴마케팅(Viral Marketing)
편집부
마케팅
2015
.05
사회적 기업의 가치공동창출 행동모델의 검증
윤성준
,
한희은
,
목옥한
경영학연구
2015
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-001084224