메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조성을 (아주대)
저널정보
연세대학교 강진다산실학연구원 다산과 현대 다산과 현대 제7호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
225 - 253 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Between Korean NeoConfucianism and Korean NeoNeoConfucianism is the Continuity and Discontinuity. These two thoughts were composed with three respects, namely Philological Research on Confucian Classics, Philosophy and Social Thought. At first the differences between two thoughts were not big but gradually the gaps were enlarged and in the end the thoughts became completely different in the abovementioned three respects.
First, in the respect of Philological Research on Confucian Classics, on the one hand Korean Neo-Neo-Confucianism, partially influenced by Korean Neo-Confucianism, formed its own interpretation systems in the end.
Secondly, in the respect of Philosophy Korean Neo-Neo-Confucianism became completely different from that of Korean Neo-Confucianism in the fact that the former is dualism but the latter is monism.
Thirdly, in the respect of Social thought Korean Neo-Confucian Social thought was based on the landownership and status system. However Korean Neo-Neo-Confucianism wanted the lift of status system and landownership.
Thus in character the latter tried to maintain Korean Medieval Society but the former wished to build up the new equal world, even though the new one is different from modern western one.

목차

[국문요약]
1. 서언
2. 연속의 측면
3. 단절적 측면
4. 조선실학의 학문적 위치와 성격
5. 결어
참고문헌
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-151-001124104