지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Between Korean NeoConfucianism and Korean NeoNeoConfucianism is the Continuity and Discontinuity. These two thoughts were composed with three respects, namely Philological Research on Confucian Classics, Philosophy and Social Thought. At first the differences between two thoughts were not big but gradually the gaps were enlarged and in the end the thoughts became completely different in the abovementioned three respects.
First, in the respect of Philological Research on Confucian Classics, on the one hand Korean Neo-Neo-Confucianism, partially influenced by Korean Neo-Confucianism, formed its own interpretation systems in the end.
Secondly, in the respect of Philosophy Korean Neo-Neo-Confucianism became completely different from that of Korean Neo-Confucianism in the fact that the former is dualism but the latter is monism.
Thirdly, in the respect of Social thought Korean Neo-Confucian Social thought was based on the landownership and status system. However Korean Neo-Neo-Confucianism wanted the lift of status system and landownership.
Thus in character the latter tried to maintain Korean Medieval Society but the former wished to build up the new equal world, even though the new one is different from modern western one.
First, in the respect of Philological Research on Confucian Classics, on the one hand Korean Neo-Neo-Confucianism, partially influenced by Korean Neo-Confucianism, formed its own interpretation systems in the end.
Secondly, in the respect of Philosophy Korean Neo-Neo-Confucianism became completely different from that of Korean Neo-Confucianism in the fact that the former is dualism but the latter is monism.
Thirdly, in the respect of Social thought Korean Neo-Confucian Social thought was based on the landownership and status system. However Korean Neo-Neo-Confucianism wanted the lift of status system and landownership.
Thus in character the latter tried to maintain Korean Medieval Society but the former wished to build up the new equal world, even though the new one is different from modern western one.
목차
[국문요약]
1. 서언
2. 연속의 측면
3. 단절적 측면
4. 조선실학의 학문적 위치와 성격
5. 결어
참고문헌
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-151-001124104