지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.8
- 수록면
- 477 - 486 (10page)
- DOI
- 10.51979/KSSLS.2014.08.57.477
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze the game contents releadt to winning/losing points of winning andlosing teams in accordance with players`` positions in club members`` tennis doubles. The subjects of this studywere 36 tennis double games of the national tennis club held inS city, G do. For the data analysis, we co-nducted cross-tabulation analysis and chi-square test, and the ersults are like following. First, the scores of th ewinning team were the highest in Areaⓐ (35.2%), while the lowest in Areaⓔ (3.9%). The proportion of scoresin Areaⓑ, Areaⓒ, and Areaⓓ were 34.1%, 8.1% and 18.7%, respecvtei ly. These differences were statisticallysignificant (p<.001). Second, the loss of scores in the winning team was the highest in Areaⓑ (33.8%) and thelowest in Areaⓐ (3.3%). The rest areas are in the order of Areaⓓ (28.1%), Areaⓔ (18.9%), and Areaⓒ (15.9%). These differences were also statistically significant (p<.001). Third, the scores of the losing team were in Areaⓐ (32.3%), Areaⓑ (37.9%), Areaⓒ (7.2%), Areaⓓ (15.7%) and Areaⓔ (6.9%), which was significantly different(p<.001). This result indicates that the loser would gain scores most often in Areaⓑ but hardly in Areaⓔ . Fourth, the loss of scores in the losing team were in Areaⓐ (03%. ), Areaⓑ (34.2%), Areaⓒ (13.7%), Areaⓓ(24.4%) and Areaⓔ (24.7%), which was also significantly different (p<.001), showing that the loser would losescores mostly in Areaⓑ but hardly in Areaⓐ. These results suggests that the amateur such as sports club tennisplayers should try to play in Areaⓐ to get more scores and lose less scores for their victory in double matches.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0