지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제35호
- 발행연도
- 2014.10
- 수록면
- 48 - 69 (22page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2014.10.35.48
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The present study analyses the texts of sample passages (1Ki 8:1-53//2Ch 5:2-6:42) from the parallels between Kings and Chronicles focusing on the translation of the New Korean Revised Version (1998). The main perspective is that the translation of the parallel texts should be equal, if both Hebrew texts are identical. The result of the analysis naturally shows the improvement of the NKRV (1998), but also exposes its problems in the translation. These problems are to be categorized as the following: (1) cases where incorrect translations or mistakes of the previous version, the Korean Revised Version (1956) are maintained; (2) cases where problems of translation are newly raised in the NKRV. These problems are found not only in one of the parallel texts, but sometimes in both of them. They are concerned mainly with the differentiated translation of the identical source text, and the active revision of one part of parallels in the NKRV. They were therefore caused either by a careless reviser, or by the absence of mutual reading to reach a consensus between revisers of the parallels.
The problematic cases can be found without effort, although the present study has set the limit to analyse just one chapter. There should therefore be much more cases where translation of the parallels between Kings and Chronicles need reconsideration. Finally, the present study insists that the New Korean Revised Version must be revised once more, at least in the passages of parallels between Kings and Chronicles.
The problematic cases can be found without effort, although the present study has set the limit to analyse just one chapter. There should therefore be much more cases where translation of the parallels between Kings and Chronicles need reconsideration. Finally, the present study insists that the New Korean Revised Version must be revised once more, at least in the passages of parallels between Kings and Chronicles.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 히브리어 두 평행본문의 특징
3. 두 평행본문에 대한 『개역개정판』의 번역 분석
4. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌(References)
Abstracts
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-233-001305057