지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제32호
- 발행연도
- 2013.4
- 수록면
- 185 - 204 (20page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2013.4.32.185
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is generally agreed that the English Standard Version (ESV) is to be placed between the NASB which aims to be a literal translation, and the NIV which aims to be a literary translation. The preface of the ESV claims that “the ESV is an ‘essentially literal’ translation that seeks as far as possible to capture the precise wording of the original text.” At the same time, the version takes readability into account. The emphasis is laid on literal translation, but the literary style of the English language is not ignored. It is generally said that such goals of the ESV’s goal is accomplished.
A close investigation demonstrates, however, that the ESV fails to maintain its consistency in some cases, or to mark any advancement over the RSV, which it follows too rigidly. This study examines some instances in which these characteristics of the ESV stand out. First, the study deals with the understanding of the imperfect tense, which represents one of the most complicated tenses when translating Greek into English. Whereas the ESV is better than the RSV or the NIV in translating the imperfect, it fails to convey the precise meaning of the imperfect tense in some passages.
Second, the translation of the conjunction ‘κα?’, reveals that the ESV has faithfully adhered to the RSV. While appropriately interpreting the conjunction as an adversative in some cases, the ESV, nevertheless, is hesitant to do so in other passages as required. The third part reviews the translation of some Greek nouns, one area where the ESV surpasses the RSV. This section also investigates an instance in Romans 14:17 where the ESV does not subscribe to its own translation principles. In sum, the ESV represents a reliable translation, which faithfully reflects the Greek text, in spite of some debatable instances explored herein.
A close investigation demonstrates, however, that the ESV fails to maintain its consistency in some cases, or to mark any advancement over the RSV, which it follows too rigidly. This study examines some instances in which these characteristics of the ESV stand out. First, the study deals with the understanding of the imperfect tense, which represents one of the most complicated tenses when translating Greek into English. Whereas the ESV is better than the RSV or the NIV in translating the imperfect, it fails to convey the precise meaning of the imperfect tense in some passages.
Second, the translation of the conjunction ‘κα?’, reveals that the ESV has faithfully adhered to the RSV. While appropriately interpreting the conjunction as an adversative in some cases, the ESV, nevertheless, is hesitant to do so in other passages as required. The third part reviews the translation of some Greek nouns, one area where the ESV surpasses the RSV. This section also investigates an instance in Romans 14:17 where the ESV does not subscribe to its own translation principles. In sum, the ESV represents a reliable translation, which faithfully reflects the Greek text, in spite of some debatable instances explored herein.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 헬라어 미완료 시제의 번역
3. 접속사 ‘κα?’의 번역
4. 단어의 번역
5. 결론
참고문헌(References)
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
루터 성경의 재검토 : 문제, 원칙, 결과 및 남은 문제
크리스토프 켈러
,
유은걸
성경원문연구
2015
.04
일본 초기 개신교의 신 용어 ‘神(かみ)’ 번역사에 대한 고찰 : 중국 초기 개신교의 용어 논쟁과 관련하여
황예렘
성경원문연구
2015
.04
『네스틀레-알란트 그리스어 신약성서 28판(한국어서문판)』 에 대한 비판적 고찰
민경식
성경원문연구
2015
.04
마태복음 19:28의 κρίνοντες에 대한 해석
김태섭
성경원문연구
2015
.04
고대 이스라엘의 의복 : 구약시대 의복을 중심으로
임미영
성경원문연구
2015
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-233-001304681