지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Chantalle Mouffe has made two interesting arguments against the desirability of social rationalization. The first is that the political project of supporting the development of a rationalized society produces a motivation challenge that renders the project difficult to accomplish. Social movements concerned with bringing about a more just world, then, ought not to understand their project as primarily directed toward making the world more rational. The second is that, if a fully rationalized society ever were achieved, it would be prone to violence. In this paper I use the theory of communicative action, developed by Jurgen Habermas, to rebut Mouffe’s claims. When we theorize rationality as communicative action instead of instrumental rationality, we come to see that neither the motivation challenge nor the argument from violence can stand as compelling arguments against the desirability of social rationalization.
목차
1. Mouffe
2. Habermas’s Alternative to Mouffe
3. Habermas’s Theory of Rationality as an Answer to Mouffe
References
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Berlin, Isaiah / 2002 / Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty / Oxford UP
2. [단행본] - Habermas, Jurgen / 1984 / The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1 / Reason and the Rationalization of Society
3. [단행본] - Hume, David. / 1999 / An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding / Oxford UP
4. [단행본] - Mouffe, Chantal / 2009 / The Democratic Paradox / Verso
2. [단행본] - Habermas, Jurgen / 1984 / The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1 / Reason and the Rationalization of Society
3. [단행본] - Hume, David. / 1999 / An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding / Oxford UP
4. [단행본] - Mouffe, Chantal / 2009 / The Democratic Paradox / Verso
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-160-001317573