지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제34호
- 발행연도
- 2014.4
- 수록면
- 55 - 82 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2014.4.34.55
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article intends to propose new names for a few books in the Old Testament of the Korean version. The Korean versions of the Bible have kept the name tradition for more than 100 years since the first publication in 1911. It is high time, however, that the names of the books in the OT be changed in view of their relevancy.
The traditional names have relied heavily upon the Chinese version by doing a thorough transliteration. In doing so, there have been many confusions. For instance, the name 申命記 implies “a repetition of the Torah” in Chinese. But Koreans can scarcely notice the meaning from its transliterated word 신명기. In order to achieve the purpose of this article, we first investigate how the Chinese version named the books of the OT, and find that the principles of classification and ending lacks consistency. Since the names of the books in the Korean version originated from those of the Chinese version, the same problems are shared. It is needed, therefore, to construct a principle for new names of the books in the OT, and a principle is suggested with five notes.
We, then, move on to explore the principle on which books can gain new suitable names, and conclude that giving new names to some books, as suggested on 〈Table 15〉 in the text, might be more appropriate.
The traditional names have relied heavily upon the Chinese version by doing a thorough transliteration. In doing so, there have been many confusions. For instance, the name 申命記 implies “a repetition of the Torah” in Chinese. But Koreans can scarcely notice the meaning from its transliterated word 신명기. In order to achieve the purpose of this article, we first investigate how the Chinese version named the books of the OT, and find that the principles of classification and ending lacks consistency. Since the names of the books in the Korean version originated from those of the Chinese version, the same problems are shared. It is needed, therefore, to construct a principle for new names of the books in the OT, and a principle is suggested with five notes.
We, then, move on to explore the principle on which books can gain new suitable names, and conclude that giving new names to some books, as suggested on 〈Table 15〉 in the text, might be more appropriate.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 『개역』 의 책 명칭 고찰
3. 새로운 번역 성경의 책명 제안
참고문헌(References)
Abstract
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-233-001304878