지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is an experimental ethnographic research to examine how anthropologists are engaging in the international development and whether there is any possibility of anthropological contribution to development as well as its meaning and constraints. The paper follows the four international development projects, applying the multi-sited ethnographic research method (Marcus 1995) to describe the concrete ``aidscapes`` and to find out the complex power relations in the overseas Korean aid program, implemented in many countries by the Korea International Cooperation Agency(KOICA) and the other non-governmental charity organizations. It is envisaged the motives, ideas, discourses and narratives, power relations, cultures of the consultancy and aid agencies, effectiveness and impacts of the aid projects can be identified by following the multi-sited projects which has been designed, implemented, and evaluated in many countries by the many stakeholders. The paper analysed that there are many specific characteristics and unique culture of the Korean development projects such as donorcentrism, too much concern of flying flag, tied aid and buy-Korean policy. The power relation embedded in the project planning and implementation process is very unequal and imbalanced between donors and recipients, experts and local peoples and there is not enough communications and dialogues between the parties related which hindering mutual understanding. The Korean development projects show various value chains such as visibility, national-interests, top-down, rapid and efficient approach of project implementation, nepotism and bureaucratic culture those are far from international norms and standards. Lastly, it is obvious that Korean international development programs lack comprehensiveness, policy coherence, accumulation of local knowledge and specialties, and effectiveness. Anthropologist, as a circumstantial activist, can not only contribute in making a better living conditions for the poor and the marginalized people but also in formulating good development policies by critical engagement with many ethnographic writings revealing the complex reality of development process.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (45)
참고문헌 신청
1. [보고서] - 감사원 / 2004 / 감사결과처분요구서-대외원조사업(ODA) 추진실태
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이태주 / 2003 / 한국의 대외원조 정책에 대한 인류학적 연구: '선진국 만들기' 와 발전 담론 / 비교문화연구 9 (1) : 139 ~ 174
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이태주 / 2004 / 국제개발사업의 인류학적 연구와 평가 및 정책 참여 -국제개발 인류학을 위한 시론 / 비교문화연구 10 (1) : 221 ~ 248
4. [학술대회논문] - 사회복지공동모금회 / 2010 / 세계와 함께하는 사랑의 열매-해외지원사업 세미나
5. [보고서] - 한국국제협력단(KOICA) / 2004 / 한-베트남 IT 대학 설립사업 사업형성조사 결과보고서
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이태주 / 2003 / 한국의 대외원조 정책에 대한 인류학적 연구: '선진국 만들기' 와 발전 담론 / 비교문화연구 9 (1) : 139 ~ 174
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이태주 / 2004 / 국제개발사업의 인류학적 연구와 평가 및 정책 참여 -국제개발 인류학을 위한 시론 / 비교문화연구 10 (1) : 221 ~ 248
4. [학술대회논문] - 사회복지공동모금회 / 2010 / 세계와 함께하는 사랑의 열매-해외지원사업 세미나
5. [보고서] - 한국국제협력단(KOICA) / 2004 / 한-베트남 IT 대학 설립사업 사업형성조사 결과보고서
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0