지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 152 (152page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this research is to develop assessment tool which can be used in consulting process for support of assistive technology device.
The development process of evaluation tool is as follows: Assessment element is deduced through literacy analysis and it was revised based on the collected opinions of experts which was the first revision. In order to test the actual applicability of developed assessment instrument, pilot test was conducted with the users of Daegu Assistive Technology Device Center. Based on the result of pilot test, it was revised for the second time and final assessment instrument created. The analysis result of reliability and validity of the developed assessment tool shows that the reliability level is satisfactory. Regarding the validity test, construct validity and convergent validity turned out to be valid. Also, a standard that enables judgment on the level of predisposition was suggested to increase the use of predisposition test on the assistive technology device.
In this research, protocol for process of consulting assessment was developed to support assistive technology device. The protocol suggests the entire process from the early consulting stage to follow-up management stage and as an assessment material for each stage of the process, predisposition test, early stage interview test and check-list for the degree of demand of assistive technology device was also developed and suggested.
This assessment tool was developed to support the task of consulting assessment of assistive technology device. However, it is expected that if some parts in main key words of predisposition test questions are adjusted, the application range can be expanded from the working disabled to all the disabled people.
The development process of evaluation tool is as follows: Assessment element is deduced through literacy analysis and it was revised based on the collected opinions of experts which was the first revision. In order to test the actual applicability of developed assessment instrument, pilot test was conducted with the users of Daegu Assistive Technology Device Center. Based on the result of pilot test, it was revised for the second time and final assessment instrument created. The analysis result of reliability and validity of the developed assessment tool shows that the reliability level is satisfactory. Regarding the validity test, construct validity and convergent validity turned out to be valid. Also, a standard that enables judgment on the level of predisposition was suggested to increase the use of predisposition test on the assistive technology device.
In this research, protocol for process of consulting assessment was developed to support assistive technology device. The protocol suggests the entire process from the early consulting stage to follow-up management stage and as an assessment material for each stage of the process, predisposition test, early stage interview test and check-list for the degree of demand of assistive technology device was also developed and suggested.
This assessment tool was developed to support the task of consulting assessment of assistive technology device. However, it is expected that if some parts in main key words of predisposition test questions are adjusted, the application range can be expanded from the working disabled to all the disabled people.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[Abstract]
[연구요약]
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구의 필요성
제2절 연구목적
제3절 평가도구 개발 과정
[제2장 평가지 개발방법]
제1절 보조공학 평가도구 개발을 위한 문헌검토
제2절 전문가 의견조사
제3절 파일럿 테스트를 통해 평가지 문항 선정
제4절 보조공학기기 사용 적합성 평가도구 타당성 검증
제5절 평가기준 마련 및 평가과정 개발
[제3장 이론적 배경]
제1절 보조공학 평가모델 관련 국내외 연구 동향
제2절 인간-공학 대응 모델 개요
제3절 외국의 보조공학 평가도구
[제4장 보조공학기기 사용 적합성 평가도구 개발]
제1절 문헌검토를 통한 문항구성
제2절 전문가 의견조사를 통한 평가지 1차 수정
제3절 파일럿 테스트를 통한 평가지 2차 수정
[제5장 신뢰도 및 타당도 평가]
제1절 평가대상자의 일반적 특성
제2절 타당도 및 신뢰도 분석결과
[제6장 평가기준 마련]
제1절 특성 변수별 선호도 점수의 평균 차이 비교
제2절 평가기준 마련
[제7장 평가과정 개발]
제1절 보조공학기기 선택을 위한 평가 과정
제2절 평가 단계별 내용
제3절 적용사례
[제8장 결론]
[참고문헌]
[부록]
참고문헌 (3)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-336-001495314