지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.89 No.2
- 발행연도
- 2015.7
- 수록면
- 55 - 60 (6page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Single-port laparoscopic splenectomy has been performed sporadically. The aim of this study is to assess our experience with single-port laparoscopic splenectomy compared to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for the usual treatment modality for various kinds of splenic disease.
Methods: Between October 2008 to February 2014, 29 patients underwent single-port laparoscopic splenectomy and 32 patients received multiport laparoscopic splenectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of single-port group and multiport group.
Results: The body mass index and disease profiles of the both groups were similar. The operative times of single-port and multiport group were 113.6 ± 39.9 and 95.9 ± 38.9 minutes, respectively (P = 0.946). The operative blood loss of the two groups were 295.8 ± 301.3 and 322.5 ± 254.5 mL (P = 0.582). Postoperative retrieved splenic weight of the single-port and multiport groups were 283.9 ± 300.7 and 362.3 ± 471.8 g, respectively (P = 0.261). One single-port partial splenectomy and 6 multiport partial splenectomies were performed in this study. There was one intraoperative gastric wall injury. It occurred in single-port group, which was successfully managed during the operation. Each case was converted to laparotomy in both groups due to bleeding. There was one mortality case in the multiport laparoscopic splenectomy group, which was not related to the splenectomy. Mean hospital stay of the single-port and multiport group was 5.8 ± 2.5 and 7.3 ± 5.2 days respectively (P = 0.140).
Conclusion: Single-port laparoscopic splenectomy seems to be a feasible approach for various kinds of splenic disease compared to multiport laparoscopic surgery.
Methods: Between October 2008 to February 2014, 29 patients underwent single-port laparoscopic splenectomy and 32 patients received multiport laparoscopic splenectomy. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of single-port group and multiport group.
Results: The body mass index and disease profiles of the both groups were similar. The operative times of single-port and multiport group were 113.6 ± 39.9 and 95.9 ± 38.9 minutes, respectively (P = 0.946). The operative blood loss of the two groups were 295.8 ± 301.3 and 322.5 ± 254.5 mL (P = 0.582). Postoperative retrieved splenic weight of the single-port and multiport groups were 283.9 ± 300.7 and 362.3 ± 471.8 g, respectively (P = 0.261). One single-port partial splenectomy and 6 multiport partial splenectomies were performed in this study. There was one intraoperative gastric wall injury. It occurred in single-port group, which was successfully managed during the operation. Each case was converted to laparotomy in both groups due to bleeding. There was one mortality case in the multiport laparoscopic splenectomy group, which was not related to the splenectomy. Mean hospital stay of the single-port and multiport group was 5.8 ± 2.5 and 7.3 ± 5.2 days respectively (P = 0.140).
Conclusion: Single-port laparoscopic splenectomy seems to be a feasible approach for various kinds of splenic disease compared to multiport laparoscopic surgery.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comparison between conventional laparoscopic splenectomy and Robotic reduced-port splenectomy using Single-site platform : single center experience
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Multiport vs. Reduced Port
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Laparoscopic total pancreatectomy and splenectomy - How i do it
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Single Port Laparoscopic TEP Hernia Repair: Is It Really Easier than Multiport?
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Single-port Laparoscopic Liver Surgeries
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2015 .02
-
Single port laparoscopic liver surgeries
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Partial splenectomy : A case series and systematic review of the literature
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2018 .05
-
Differences in Anatomic and Technical Considerations: Single Port vs Multiport Cholecystectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Partial Splenectomy for Splenic Tumor in Pediatric Patients
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Single Port Laparoscopic Liver Resection
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for ColoRectal Cancer : Experience of First 10 years
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2019 .02
-
Prognostic significance of splenectomy during completion total gastrectomy in patients with remnant gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2021 .12
-
Single-Port Laparoscopic Journey -The Road to Notes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
[Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgery] A Single Center’s Initial Experiences of Single-port Robotic Cholecystectomy and Single-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Comparison of Surgical Outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Clinical Advantages of Single Port Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Comparison of Single Incision and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis according to the Severity
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .05
-
Review of 3,665 cases of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in 7 years in single community hospital by single surgeon
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2022 .12
-
Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Children with Hereditory Spherocytosis : An Single Large Center Experience
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Single-port Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Safety and Efficacy of Single-Port Laparoscopic Ileostomy in Palliative Settings
Annals of Coloproctology
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-514-001722665