지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After the outbreak of the Pacific war, the military alliance was formed among the U.S, China and the U.K. However, the three countries imposed different strategic purposes. As a result, due to strategic differences to counter Japan among those countries and the appointment of Stilwell caused the total defeat of the allied power at Burma less than two months of their engagement against Japan. After 1943 when the war started to turn in favor of the allied forces through the Europe and the Pacific, the U.S., China, and the U.K. made a final decisions that was to concentrate its power on Germany first, and then on Japan. Meanwhile, the initiation and the training of Chinese expeditionary forces, X and Y forces for the allied forces’counterattack in the Southeast Asia, progressed rather quickly under the command of General Stilwell. The formation of X force was superior to any of the Chinese troops in terms of the quality and quantity. The troop’s combat power was comparable to that of Japan and it was to be used as the main force for the counter attack in Burma.
The counter operation in Northern Burma started in December 1943 and ended in victories by using Y force as main force in support of X force in January 27,1945. However, the prior strategic focus on Europe by the U.S. and the U.K. and the Northern Burma operation yielded a serious consequence. Due to the Japan’s No. 1 operation, China lost most of its eastern territory and the Chines force was on the verge of collapse. When the Japanese main troops attacked the Chinesemainl and, the China’s most powerful troops were fighting in Burma. It was no doubt that the Teheran agreement of Europe centric strategy made the war in Europe to end more quickly. However, this strategy eventually caused a great disaster in Northeast Asia. In North Eastern Asia ,the Soviet Union could expand its influence in Manchuria while the three countries focused their efforts on Burma. This caused a decisive impact on the Chinese civil war after the war ended.
The counter operation in Northern Burma started in December 1943 and ended in victories by using Y force as main force in support of X force in January 27,1945. However, the prior strategic focus on Europe by the U.S. and the U.K. and the Northern Burma operation yielded a serious consequence. Due to the Japan’s No. 1 operation, China lost most of its eastern territory and the Chines force was on the verge of collapse. When the Japanese main troops attacked the Chinesemainl and, the China’s most powerful troops were fighting in Burma. It was no doubt that the Teheran agreement of Europe centric strategy made the war in Europe to end more quickly. However, this strategy eventually caused a great disaster in Northeast Asia. In North Eastern Asia ,the Soviet Union could expand its influence in Manchuria while the three countries focused their efforts on Burma. This caused a decisive impact on the Chinese civil war after the war ended.
목차
1. 서론
2. 일본의 남진과 버마의 상실
3. 중국원정군(XㆍY부대)의 창설과 훈련
4. 북버마 반격작전과 그 전략적 문제
5. 결론
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
Don Moser / 1980 / China-Burma-India / Time-Life Books Inc
Charles F. Romanus / 1953 / United States Army in World War Ⅱ China-Burma-India Theater: Stilwell's Mission to China / Office of The of Military History Department of The Army
Lloyd E. Eastman / 1986 / Seeds of Destruction: Nationalist China in War and Revolution, 1937~1949, In 蔣介石은 왜 敗하였는가 / 지식산업사 :163~186
James C. Hsiung / 1992 / China's Bitter Victory: The War with Japan 1937~1945 / M. E. Sharpe Inc. :152~176
何理 / 1985 / 抗日戰爭史 / 上海人民出版社 :452~453
Charles F. Romanus / 1953 / United States Army in World War Ⅱ China-Burma-India Theater: Stilwell's Mission to China / Office of The of Military History Department of The Army
Lloyd E. Eastman / 1986 / Seeds of Destruction: Nationalist China in War and Revolution, 1937~1949, In 蔣介石은 왜 敗하였는가 / 지식산업사 :163~186
James C. Hsiung / 1992 / China's Bitter Victory: The War with Japan 1937~1945 / M. E. Sharpe Inc. :152~176
何理 / 1985 / 抗日戰爭史 / 上海人民出版社 :452~453
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-001807210