지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.9
- 수록면
- 101 - 112 (12page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
To the extent of this study, focused on the aspects of material, form, and space, traditional upper-class house in Korea and Japan will be analyzed; the characteristics of nonmaterial expression are concluded as follows.
1. The similar appearances were presented in Korean’ and Japanese’ house in the intervals between rooms in aspects of material and space. In the material aspect, the expressions of breaking boundary was detected in both architect styles, using Han-ji and Wa-si, which share features of transparency. At the open of windows and doors, both houses represent such characteristics in the intervals, being embodied of visual communication with spaces directly. However, at the close of windows and doors, the spatial decomposition is observed in Korean house whereas the condition is hardly built in Japanese house, applying thick Husuma.
Meanwhile, there are distinct differences of Korea and Japan found in formal aspect, in between interior and exterior area, and in between exterior and another exterior area. To sum up these discriminative conditions; Korea has non-material expression developed depicting models from nature as they exist or using the method that allows one to accept the nature as it is. On the contrary, Japan has its characteristic based on the contrast of figuration, cut-off in outside the nature, or placement of fabricated nature beside the area. In this perspective, Koreans’ expressions are observed to have a raw feature, however, Japanese’ are appeared to conceive the traits built upon artificial modification. Fundamentally, Korean built the house after constructing a village based on the relationship between surrounding environment, contrary to Japan from whose style is not deduced such architectural psychology based on a relationship among the nature and the village as Korea.
2. In the ideological background, Wuwei Ziran?letting nature be, leaving the nature as it is? exists in Korea and Mu-zou-kan?a view of life as something transient and empty?in Japan, and Korean spaces naturally represent characteristics of circular and mutual?non-selfish?space constituted on the link of overall relationship beyond boundaries. Consequently, Japanese space differentiates its traits of independent, non-circular, and own selfish space from Korea.
It is very important and necessary to establish for the Korean traditional House’s excellency with multidirectional objectification of Korean traditional space’s characteristics. And this paper presents the findings obtained from the investigation of immaterial peculiarities retained in the Japanese traditional House of upper class, on the base of the preceding research -residence of the gentility in the Korean Joseon Dynasty.
1. The similar appearances were presented in Korean’ and Japanese’ house in the intervals between rooms in aspects of material and space. In the material aspect, the expressions of breaking boundary was detected in both architect styles, using Han-ji and Wa-si, which share features of transparency. At the open of windows and doors, both houses represent such characteristics in the intervals, being embodied of visual communication with spaces directly. However, at the close of windows and doors, the spatial decomposition is observed in Korean house whereas the condition is hardly built in Japanese house, applying thick Husuma.
Meanwhile, there are distinct differences of Korea and Japan found in formal aspect, in between interior and exterior area, and in between exterior and another exterior area. To sum up these discriminative conditions; Korea has non-material expression developed depicting models from nature as they exist or using the method that allows one to accept the nature as it is. On the contrary, Japan has its characteristic based on the contrast of figuration, cut-off in outside the nature, or placement of fabricated nature beside the area. In this perspective, Koreans’ expressions are observed to have a raw feature, however, Japanese’ are appeared to conceive the traits built upon artificial modification. Fundamentally, Korean built the house after constructing a village based on the relationship between surrounding environment, contrary to Japan from whose style is not deduced such architectural psychology based on a relationship among the nature and the village as Korea.
2. In the ideological background, Wuwei Ziran?letting nature be, leaving the nature as it is? exists in Korea and Mu-zou-kan?a view of life as something transient and empty?in Japan, and Korean spaces naturally represent characteristics of circular and mutual?non-selfish?space constituted on the link of overall relationship beyond boundaries. Consequently, Japanese space differentiates its traits of independent, non-circular, and own selfish space from Korea.
It is very important and necessary to establish for the Korean traditional House’s excellency with multidirectional objectification of Korean traditional space’s characteristics. And this paper presents the findings obtained from the investigation of immaterial peculiarities retained in the Japanese traditional House of upper class, on the base of the preceding research -residence of the gentility in the Korean Joseon Dynasty.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 한국 · 일본 전통 상류주택 공간특성
Ⅲ. 비물질적 표현 특성
Ⅳ. 분석
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 권영걸 / 2000 / 공간디자인의 비물질화 경향에관한 연구 / 한국실내디자인학회논문집 : 61 ~ 68
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김동영 / 2010 / 일본 전통건축 입면의 역동적 특성 / 주거환경 8 (2) : 25 ~ 35
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김동영 / 2005 / 한국, 일본 전통건축공간의 지향성 / 한국주거학회논문집 16 (6) : 101 ~ 109
[단행본] - 신영복 / 2004 / 강의 / 돌베게
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 조성기 / 1995 / 한국 전통주택의 안마당에 관한연구 / 대한건축학회 논문집 : 71 ~ 80
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김동영 / 2010 / 일본 전통건축 입면의 역동적 특성 / 주거환경 8 (2) : 25 ~ 35
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김동영 / 2005 / 한국, 일본 전통건축공간의 지향성 / 한국주거학회논문집 16 (6) : 101 ~ 109
[단행본] - 신영복 / 2004 / 강의 / 돌베게
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 조성기 / 1995 / 한국 전통주택의 안마당에 관한연구 / 대한건축학회 논문집 : 71 ~ 80
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본건축의 비물질적 표현 특성
주거환경
2021 .09
-
치유공간으로서의 고택 : 전상국의 “동행”을 중심으로
관광레저연구
2016 .01
-
A Study on the Space Development Race between South and North Korea and suggestions for South Korea's space policy
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2021 .12
-
A Study on the Korean Writing in Japanese - From an Educational Point of View of Japanese -
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2019 .07
-
Measures to Strengthen Space Cooperation among South Korea, the U.S., and Japan
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2022 .12
-
태국 전통주거의 지역적 특성 고찰 -북부지역의 란나 전통주거를 중심으로-
한국태국학회논총
2020 .01
-
그룹발표 활동을 통해 본 한일간 이문화 커뮤니케이션의 일례
일본언어문화
2019 .01
-
토픽모델링을 활용한 국내 일본지역학 동향분석: 2000년대 이후 주요 학술지 게재논문을 중심으로
Journal of Global and Area Studies
2023 .03
-
안도타다오(安藤忠雄) 건축의 비물질적 표현 특성
주거환경
2020 .09
-
Changes in Foreigners’ Settlement Space in Seoul, Korea, 1882 to 1910: Focusing on Chinese and Japanese Demographic Changes and Commercial Activities
Korea Journal
2019 .12
-
韓国におけるビジネス日本語教材の一考察
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2016 .10
-
한국인의 자연관 형성 배경과 그 특징에 대한 이론적 고찰
생물교육
2017 .01
-
건축공간계획에 있어서 스페이스 프로그램 교육 활용 사례연구
한국퍼실리티매니지먼트학회지
2017 .12
-
‘언론’ 관련 용어의 의미와 쓰임에 관한 한국과 일본의 차이
한국언론정보학보
2021 .12
-
A Study on the Strengthening Space Cooperation between South Korea and the EU
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2023 .06
-
在日韓国人作家の作品に見られる日本語の異化と多様化についての考察－韓国語翻訳本との比較を中心として－
일본언어문화
2016 .01
-
유아 공간 연구 동향 분석
유아교육연구
2017 .01
-
한일 국교 정상화 전후 부산의 일본인 유골 문제를 둘러싼 위령(慰霊)의 정치
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2023 .10
-
고택체험자 방문동기별 선택속성, 만족도 차이와 관계 연구 - 경주지역 고택을 중심으로 -
호텔리조트연구
2021 .08
-
중국의 사회공간 문제에 대한 인식 및 주요 쟁점 고찰
한중사회과학연구
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0