메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김홍래 (세계민족무용연구소)
저널정보
중앙대학교 일본연구소 일본연구 일본연구 제37집
발행연도
2014.8
수록면
251 - 272 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In court ritual of Nara period, embellishing headdress that made with the plant, was an magical act what accept of the vitality of plants, and had an function which to share the spirit of the event and to distinguish between participants as the event marker. However, as the Heian period, headdress is fixed as a ritual props, and is had the function as the marker indicating the position or identity of the people who attended the event. In Hananoen, Prince gaving a headdress to Hikarugenji, maybe means to pray magical or to reproduce using props, but I think it was meant to be clarify the identity and status of Hikarugenji.
And, Tenno grant the cloth his wore, is an political action expressing the personal solidarity. It means the seeking of political relations and moral solidarity with servants, that tenno deign his worn cloth to him. So prince grant his cloth to Tonotyuzyo, is an political action to bilt the personal solidarity with him. It is contrast to giving an headdress to Hikarugenji and to identity of their relationship clearly. So we can see that the prince has an imagination to make Tonotyuzyo his confidant, and to excluse Hikarugenji in his reign, from the difference between the two Tamamono.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 가자시(挿頭)의 역사적 전개와 기능 변화
3. 궁중의례에 있어서 사물(賜物)의 의미와 기능
4. 맺음말
参考文献
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-830-002000278