지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to define Korean subject in terms of linguistic typology, especially based on predicate type-centered definition. It is well acknowledged among Korean scholars that Korean subject is difficult to define directly by one criterion. This is because the subject can realize without subject case, and sometimes occur with auxiliary case markers that have independent semantic meanings. To more Korean subject can often occur with non subject case marker such as dative ``-eke``, locative ``-ese``, even sometimes honorific maker ``-kkese``. Because of these seeming confusions, scholars rather depend on several syntactic devise all in one to define subject, such as subject case ``i/ka``, agreement ending ``-si``, reflexive pronoun ``caki``, relativization, topicalization etc. Instead of those indirect and insufficient subject tests, we directly provide with a typologically prevailed subject definition, that is, a predicate-centered. This was originated from Comrie(1978), and Dixon(1979), and subject is defined by numerical valence and generalized argument roles. According to this Korean subject may be defined as {S, d-S, A1, A2} respectively, where S means a sole argument of intransitive, d-S means derived S in passive sentence, A1 and A2 means a most agent-like argument in transitive and ditransive. However, the definition like above could also have subsequent problems left out. For instance, because of we did not define Korean subject in terms of case, it is logical to answer what kind of function the subject case do, and how many types of predicate are there in Korean, and finally how we define other grammatical relations like object, complement etc. Those are the problems we hope to research on subsequently.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-701-002265693