지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to examine the subject of Korean double subject constructions in terms of nominal argument structures instead of verbal argument structures as in previous researches. An argument is an expression that helps complete the meaning of a predicate. However, nouns do have their arguments as predicates do. And as predicates, a noun also forms a/an argument(s)-noun structure. Arguments must be distinguished from adjuncts. While a noun needs its arguments to complete its meaning, the adjuncts that appear with a noun are optional; they are not necessary to complete the meaning of the noun. Researching on nominal argument structure in double subject constructions, what we have found are as follows. First, a noun must take arguments in sentence in order to obtain its reference. Second, most nouns take zero, one, two, or three arguments depending on their semantic structure. Third, only argument(s) of a noun can be the NP1 subject of the double subject construction while adjunct(s) of a noun can not so. Firth, because NP1 is an argument of NP2, NP1 is not the real subject of the entire sentence; rather, the whole genitive construction, that is, NP1-uy NP2-ka is the real subject of the double subject constructions. Fifth, the so called case marker KA combined with NP1 is a semantic particle representing [+specificity]. Sixth, the previous term phrasal verb needs to be closely elaborated. If a noun cannot realize its argument(s) within NP, and can do so only by combining it with following (light)verb, only then we call the [noun+verb] as phrasal verb.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-701-002271815