메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 이화사회과학원 사회과학연구논총 사회과학연구논총 제30권 제2호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
269 - 317 (49page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Whereas the rise of women’s rights globally has contributed to the expansion of women’s economic rights and women-friendly employment policies, it is an empirical question to ask if the expansion of women’s economic rights at the policy level has improved women’s economic rights, Particularly, while the impact of the welfare state on the quantity and quality of women’s employment is widely studied, little research has further investigated the ways other (non-welfare) types of policies affect women’s occupational opportunities. In this paper, I attempt to explain the level of gender occupational inequality in 2004 in 35 countries through cross-national variations in particular state policies in 1984. I create an original indicator of two types of policies: laws designed to help women combine employment and childrearing responsibilities (measured by a paid maternity leave policy) and laws that promote non-discrimination (measured by a policy that guarantees equal access to all occupations and a policy that guarantees equal remuneration). My data thus include three policies altogether: maternity-leave policies and two distinct forms of anti-discrimination policies. I find that state policies are the strongest determinants, compared to global and female human capital factors, of the gender occupational inequality but different types of policies have different impacts. Specifically, maternity leave is associated with a greater level of occupational gender inequality while anti-discrimination legislation is associated with less occupational inequality within countries. Although a panel analysis for a relatively small number of countries should not be overgeneralized, the results do introduce new information about policy-specific consequences for gender occupational inequality and provide a solid foundation for future research.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (56)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-300-002382185