메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제17집 제3호
발행연도
2015.9
수록면
249 - 274 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
An unborn child``s life is not completely protected in the traffic accident. Even so, the life protection before one is born can not be strengthened through extending the scope of persons who are advanced by the time of them. This attempt is given rise to overprotection of punishment. In this regard, under the legal theory, this paper consists of whether or not a negligent homicide is established only if an unborn child is dead after birth, which is called as a fetal homicide. Therefore, the following part is suggested as a solution with a fetal homicide. If a negligent homicide is only different from a crime of homicide as an intentional offense, but there is no difference substantially between a negligenthomicide and a crime of homicide, it is understandable that a negligent fetal homicide is established as a negligent homicide within the scope of admitting the establishment of negligent homicides with abortion as a first action. As a result, At the time of occurrence of objects, which is after a fetus is born, the result of infringement with one``s life occurs and the causal relationship shall be admitted between an action and consequence. This regard can admit the establishment of negligent homicides easily when the expected date of delivery gets closer and the period of survival after birth gets longer. In the case of infringement of fetus life resulting from traffic accidents, it definitely distinguishes from whether the infringement is typical abortion or by long-term survival so that the result of infringement of life occurs after a fetus is born and if the causal relationship between the action of traffic accidents and the consequence of infringement of life is admitted, an negligent homicide with fetus can be established. However, it is necessary to confine the punishment even though it shall be decided on whether or not a negligent homicide is established in the case of fetus homicides. Firstly, it is the negligent abortion. An unfair result occurs to punish the negligent abortion for pregnant women if a fetal homicide is punished as a negligent homicide. However, in the case of establishment of negligent homicide with fetal homicides, the negligent homicide for pregnant women is not simultaneously established. Secondly, a fetus homicide cannot punish the symptom of fixed types. That is to say, it is a difference between infringing the current benefit and protection of the law and delivering the infringed one so that it is not admitted on the result of injuries as a change of benefit and protection of the law with one``s body. By contrast, if there is no action, it is punishable within the scope where the function of benefit and protection of the law at the specific time is operated.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002578969