지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is to aim reconfigure the naval combat known as the Battle of Tsushima, having considered as a turning point of the Russo-Japanese War by time and space and is to suggest in order to use the term ‘East Sea Battle’ to reflect more comprehensively the nature of the battle.
From 27th to 28th May 1905, The Russian and the Japanese fleet collided into each other on near sea area of Tsushima in Korea Strait and located between Ulleung-do and Dok-do in the East Sea.
As a result of this battle, Japan could fully seize the initiatives of the war. Japanese combined fleet annihilated the second Pacific Fleet of Russia that has scrambled from Baltic Sea and the Russian Navy was severly damaged so that it cannot be recovered in the short term. So the Japan not only seized the initiative of war but also occupied the East Sea as its inland sea resulting in gaining the initiative in Northeast Asia maritime.
So far, in the domestic academic community, it did not use the name of East Sea Battle. There are some cases of use the term ‘East Sea Battle’ to describe a series of battles that have been developed in the East Sea during Russo-Japanese War 1904-1905. But, there were no cases named as the “East Sea Battle” on the series of battle deployed May 27th to 28th in 1905. Also foreign academic circles, including Russia, were named the battle taken place on May 27th in Tsushima offshore as the “Tsushima Sea Battle” (對馬島戰鬪, The Battle of Tsushima, Цусимское сражение)not as the “East Sea Battle”. It means it does not give significant meaning for the battle developed in the Midwest of East Sea(Ulleung-do, Dok-do, Ul-san gulf and Juk-byeon gulf) while the Russian warship has fled to the north on next day, May 28th.
However, Battle was conducted for the purpose of pursuit and mopping up the remnants of Russian warships that escaping up to north Eastern Sea and Vladivostok as a result of Tsushima Battle. In this paper, the three stages of the battle were splitted into three stages by time zone and examined that each stage has been developed in different areas. To generically name the entire battles, it seems more appropriate to call “East Sea Battle” than “Tsushima battle”. The battle is not limited to Tsushima sea area spatially and looking through a battle step by step, it was found that using term “East Sea Battle” has an advantage of analyze an aspect of battle in detail.
From 27th to 28th May 1905, The Russian and the Japanese fleet collided into each other on near sea area of Tsushima in Korea Strait and located between Ulleung-do and Dok-do in the East Sea.
As a result of this battle, Japan could fully seize the initiatives of the war. Japanese combined fleet annihilated the second Pacific Fleet of Russia that has scrambled from Baltic Sea and the Russian Navy was severly damaged so that it cannot be recovered in the short term. So the Japan not only seized the initiative of war but also occupied the East Sea as its inland sea resulting in gaining the initiative in Northeast Asia maritime.
So far, in the domestic academic community, it did not use the name of East Sea Battle. There are some cases of use the term ‘East Sea Battle’ to describe a series of battles that have been developed in the East Sea during Russo-Japanese War 1904-1905. But, there were no cases named as the “East Sea Battle” on the series of battle deployed May 27th to 28th in 1905. Also foreign academic circles, including Russia, were named the battle taken place on May 27th in Tsushima offshore as the “Tsushima Sea Battle” (對馬島戰鬪, The Battle of Tsushima, Цусимское сражение)not as the “East Sea Battle”. It means it does not give significant meaning for the battle developed in the Midwest of East Sea(Ulleung-do, Dok-do, Ul-san gulf and Juk-byeon gulf) while the Russian warship has fled to the north on next day, May 28th.
However, Battle was conducted for the purpose of pursuit and mopping up the remnants of Russian warships that escaping up to north Eastern Sea and Vladivostok as a result of Tsushima Battle. In this paper, the three stages of the battle were splitted into three stages by time zone and examined that each stage has been developed in different areas. To generically name the entire battles, it seems more appropriate to call “East Sea Battle” than “Tsushima battle”. The battle is not limited to Tsushima sea area spatially and looking through a battle step by step, it was found that using term “East Sea Battle” has an advantage of analyze an aspect of battle in detail.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 동해해전의 전개과정
3. 나오는 말
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (8)
참고문헌 신청
[학술지(정기간행물)] - 김화경 / 2011 / 동해 해전과 독도의 전략적 가치 -러일전쟁과 일본의 독도 강탈을 중심으로 한 고찰- / 대구사학 103 : 149 ~ 176
[단행본] - E.B.Potter / 1960 / Sea Power. A NavalHistory / Prentice-Hall,Inc. : 360 ~ 364
[단행본] - 別宮暖郞 / 2005 / 坂の上の雲では分からない日本海海戰
[단행본] - 近現代史編纂會 / 2003 / 日露戰爭 / 新人物往來社
[단행본] - 海軍軍令部 / 2006 / 명치 37,38년 해전사(하권) : 276 ~ 277
[단행본] - E.B.Potter / 1960 / Sea Power. A NavalHistory / Prentice-Hall,Inc. : 360 ~ 364
[단행본] - 別宮暖郞 / 2005 / 坂の上の雲では分からない日本海海戰
[단행본] - 近現代史編纂會 / 2003 / 日露戰爭 / 新人物往來社
[단행본] - 海軍軍令部 / 2006 / 명치 37,38년 해전사(하권) : 276 ~ 277
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
6·25전쟁기 영천전투의 재조명
한국군사학논집
2021 .02
-
사상 최대 레이테 해전의 전투경과 분석과 전투 교훈 고찰
한국군사학논총
2017 .06
-
‘세계 4대 해전’의 근거에 대한 고찰 : 국내의 ‘세계 4대 해전’ 담론 형성과정을 중심으로
군사
2016 .12
-
명량해전 이후 조선함대의 해상진 이동 이유에 대한 전략적 분석 - 콜벳의 현존함대 전략을 중심으로
한국군사학논총
2021 .01
-
전쟁에서 발생하는 전투의 규모와 빈도 관계에 적용되는 멱함수 분포에 대한 연구
Crisisonomy
2021 .08
-
The Seven-Year Battle: China’s Fight Against Air Pollution
Global Asia
2019 .12
-
사할린전투에 관한 일고(一考)
군사
2015 .12
-
북접농민군의 전투방식과 영동 용산전투
동학학보
2018 .09
-
대한민국 동해의 국제표준 명칭에 대한 발전적 대안 모색
한국도시지리학회지
2015 .01
-
후삼국 통일전쟁과 운주전투
군사
2019 .03
-
전투력 요소로 본 이순신의 전투준비태세와 초기전투 승리요인
군사
2016 .03
-
임진왜란 시 청주성 전투에 관한 실증적 고찰
한국군사학논총
2020 .01
-
의문점 고찰(考察)을 통한 제2차 진주성 전투 재조명
한일군사문화연구
2021 .08
-
부산포 해전의 바른 역사적 명명을 위한 試稿
동북아 문화연구
2024 .09
-
6·25전쟁기 호주군의 참전 과정과 가평지구전투
한국군사학논집
2020 .06
-
북접농민군의 교단 거점 수비와 청주 일대의 전투
동학학보
2017 .06
-
백마고지 전투 간 국군 제9사단의 화력운용 고찰 - 포병운용을 중심으로 -
군사
2020 .12
-
노량해전의 조명연합수군 규모
군사
2023 .03
-
ビブリオバトルを取り入れた日本語授業の実践報告
일본근대학연구
2016 .01
-
공민왕 13(1364)년 김속명(金續命)의 진해현(鎭海縣) 전투와 육전론(陸戰論)
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-002208726