지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study explores Korean equivalents to 「-te iru」, the usage of its meaning and the grammatical restriction of {-go issta}, {-o issta}, {-nda}, {-ossta}. Korean verbs have similar usages to the Japanese verb 「-te iru」. {-go issta} implies the continual state of action, the state of results, repetition, and {-o issta} implies the state of results. {-nda} shows the continual state when the verb meets continual verbs, and also the truth of present, the habitual action of present, and the continuance of the resultative state when the verb meets momentary verbs according to the momentary verb rules. {-ossta} shows the habit of the past or experience when the verb meets continual verbs and shows the continuance of the resultative state and just the state when the verbs th meet momentary verbs. The usage of meaning is available in both intransitive and transitive verbs, but {-o issta} is available only in intransitive verbs. When 「-te iru」 is compared with its Korean equivalents, it appears that Korean equivalents have more comprehensive significance. It represents that Korean equivalents are more vague in tense and meaning. Therefore, Korean equivalents have the kind of verbs as well as the meaning problems, indistinct in tense, meaning and the rules when they meet certain grammatical restriction rules. (Catholic University of Daegu)
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (44)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002563297