메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Ji-won Anh (Ewha Womans University) Ji-Man Park (Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital) Youn-Sic Chun (Ewha Womans University) Miae Kim (Ewha Womans University) Minji Kim (Ewha Womans University)
저널정보
대한치과교정학회 대한치과교정학회지 대한치과교정학회지 제46권 제1호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
3 - 12 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the precision of threedimensional (3D) images acquired using iTero<SUP>®</SUP> (Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and Trios<SUP>®</SUP> (3Shape Dental Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark) digital intraoral scanners, and to evaluate the effects of the severity of tooth irregularities and scanning sequence on precision. Methods: Dental arch models were fabricated with differing degrees of tooth irregularity and divided into 2 groups based on scanning sequence. To assess their precision, images were superimposed and an optimized superimposition algorithm was employed to measure any 3D deviation. The t -test, paired t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed (p < 0.05) for statistical analysis. Results: The iTero<SUP>®</SUP> and Trios<SUP>®</SUP> systems showed no statistically significant difference in precision among models with differing degrees of tooth irregularity. However, there were statistically significant differences in the precision of the 2 scanners when the starting points of scanning were different. The iTero<SUP>®</SUP> scanner (mean deviation, 29.84 ± 12.08 mm) proved to be less precise than the Trios<SUP>®</SUP> scanner (22.17 ± 4.47 mm). Conclusions: The precision of 3D images differed according to the degree of tooth irregularity, scanning sequence, and scanner type. However, from a clinical standpoint, both scanners were highly accurate regardless of the degree of tooth irregularity.

목차

INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-515-002577423