메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Peirce's Semiotics and the Interpretation of Signs
Recommendations
Search
Questions

퍼스의 기호 개념과 기호 해석

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Yangjin Noh (전남대학교)
Journal
The New Korean Philosophical Association Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association Vol. 83 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2016.1
Pages
95 - 110 (16page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Peirce's Semiotics and the Interpretation of Signs
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
The main purpose of this paper is to examine some difficulties of Peirce’s semiotics from the experientialist view and offer a new direction of explicating Peirce’s semiotic insights in more concrete terms. With the notion of “Interpretant,” Peirce opened up the sapce for accounting for the central role of human being as the symbol producer/user in symbolization. However, he had left the question of the ultimate source of the symbolic meaning unturned, which, as I shall suggest, grounds in the physical level of human experience. Peirce’s difficulty revolves around the opacity of the notion of Interpretant. Peirce himself presented Interpretant sometimes as an idea, and sometimes as an interpreting consciousness, and this seems to be a confusion caused by his unfit conception of symbolization itself. I have suggested that the source of symbolic meaning is the experience- content of human being as the symbol producer/user, and that it is ultimately grounded in the physical level of experience. Symbolic level of experience, on the other hand, is an extended aspect of the physical level of experience, where ‘symbolic mapping’ plays a central role. Symbolic mapping is a cognitive mechanism which is far more fundamental than Peirce’s triadic elements, and thus, it should be accounted for separately from Peirce’s triadic model. There seems to be no room for symbolic mapping in Peirce’s picture, and this seems to be the crux where Peirce’s semiotic inquiry fell into the intractable complication. The notion of symbolic mapping shall not end in disintegrating or subverting the whole structure of Peirce’s semiotics, but open up a new direction of advancing it in more refined empirical terms.

Contents

[한글 요약]
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 사고로서의 기호
Ⅲ. 해석체의 수수께끼
Ⅳ. 기호적 경험과 기호적 사상
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌
[Abstract]

References (14)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.