메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
Chung Sik Kim (Pohang University of Science and Technology) Heejin Kim (Pohang University of Science and Technology) Bora Kang (Pohang University of Science and Technology) Mingyu Lee (Pohang University of Science and Technology) Min. K. Chung (Pohang University of Science and Technology) Bong-ha Hwang (Hyundai Motor Company) Byungsul Lee (Hyundai Motor Company)
저널정보
대한인간공학회 대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집 대한인간공학회 2012 추계학술대회
발행연도
2012.11
수록면
112 - 117 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate actual driving postures and seat configurations in a coach based on field research data. Background: Vehicle cockpit should be ergonomically designed because it is closely related with safety of drivers and passengers. Especially coach takes on more passengers and is more difficult to drive than the other vehicles such as a sedan and a recreation vehicle, thus it is important to design coach cockpit ergonomically. However, few studies have focused on a coach cockpit especially driving posture and seat configurations which were basic data for cockpit design. Method: For the 34 coach drivers, we took pictures of their driving posture and overall cockpit, and measured seat height and seatback angle in their own vehicle. We measured forward-backward location of seat for the 19 drivers in the second field research. Results: Driving postures were classified into four groups based on torso angle of driver and contact/separate with seat; a contact with seat and erected posture, a contact with seat and normal posture, a contact with seat and relaxed posture, and a separate with seat and erected posture. For the forward-backward location of seat, 36.8% of drivers adjusted location of seat backward than the design criterion (150mm). For the seat height, mean of seat height was 20mm low than the design criterion (375mm), and 62.5% of drivers adjusted seat lower than the design criterion. For the seatback angle, 25.0% of drivers adjusted seatback angle backward than the design criterion (107°). Conclusion: We investigated the driving posture and seat configurations in a coach, and identified that there is considerable gab between actual seat configurations and design criteria. Especially large numbers of their settings could cause lack of rear space in the cockpit. Application: The results of this study can be used for basic data for ergonomic design of a coach cockpit.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion and conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0